[bug#25848] [PATCH] gnu: %bootstrap-coreutils

[bug#25848] [PATCH] gnu: %bootstrap-coreutils

[Jonathan Brielmaier]

@Manolis: Does this problem still exist with all the new Hurd work from
Janneke and Co?

[bug#25848] [PATCH] gnu: %bootstrap-coreutils&co: Patch egrep/fgrep to point to the correct grep.

[zimoun]

Hi Manolis,

I am doing bug triage and I hit this one [1].

1: <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/25848>


On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 at 13:41, manolis837@gmail.com wrote:

> Commit 653add37af10b0d5dbc20c8bc7ce30eec8cf4ae7 patches egrep/fgrep to point to the location of grep.
> But the problem is that when it was run on Hurd, the path for grep in egrep/fgrep had this form:
> /gnu/store/eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee-grep-2.25/bin/grep
>
> The above was not being substituted and caused the build to fail. So I changed the pattern to
> "/[^ ]+/bin/grep" and now the path is always replaced.
>
> Also (getcwd) returns the current path which the build takes place. This happens to be /tmp/guix-build-..-bootstrap-binaries-0.
> This is wrong because it should point to the final place in /gnu/store. That why I am using "out".

Is it still relevant after the work by janneke among many others?  And
exposed in these blog post [2,3].


2: <https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2020/a-hello-world-virtual-machine-running-the-hurd/>
3: <https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2020/childhurds-and-substitutes/>


Cheers,
simon

[bug#25848] [PATCH] gnu: %bootstrap-coreutils&co: Patch egrep/fgrep to point to the correct grep.

[Efraim Flashner]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1575 bytes --]

On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 12:57:25AM +0100, zimoun wrote:
> Hi Manolis,
> 
> I am doing bug triage and I hit this one [1].
> 
> 1: <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/25848>
> 
> 
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 at 13:41, manolis837@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> > Commit 653add37af10b0d5dbc20c8bc7ce30eec8cf4ae7 patches egrep/fgrep to point to the location of grep.
> > But the problem is that when it was run on Hurd, the path for grep in egrep/fgrep had this form:
> > /gnu/store/eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee-grep-2.25/bin/grep
> >
> > The above was not being substituted and caused the build to fail. So I changed the pattern to
> > "/[^ ]+/bin/grep" and now the path is always replaced.
> >
> > Also (getcwd) returns the current path which the build takes place. This happens to be /tmp/guix-build-..-bootstrap-binaries-0.
> > This is wrong because it should point to the final place in /gnu/store. That why I am using "out".
> 
> Is it still relevant after the work by janneke among many others?  And
> exposed in these blog post [2,3].
> 
> 
> 2: <https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2020/a-hello-world-virtual-machine-running-the-hurd/>
> 3: <https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2020/childhurds-and-substitutes/>
> 

Judging that the Hurd, aarch64 and powerpc are all have Guix working on
them I assume it's working well enough that we can close this bug.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   רנשלפ םירפא
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

bug#25848: [PATCH] gnu: %bootstrap-coreutils&co: Patch egrep/fgrep to point to the correct grep.

[zimoun]

Hi,

On Wed, 05 Jan 2022 at 10:23, Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 12:57:25AM +0100, zimoun wrote:
>> On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 at 13:41, manolis837@gmail.com wrote:

> Judging that the Hurd, aarch64 and powerpc are all have Guix working on
> them I assume it's working well enough that we can close this bug.

Therefore, I am closing.


Thanks,
simon

[bug#25848] [PATCH] gnu: %bootstrap-coreutils&co: Patch egrep/fgrep to point to the correct grep.

[Manolis Ragkousis]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 517 bytes --]

Thank you, yes it can be closed.

On Wed, 5 Jan 2022, 11:11 zimoun, <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 05 Jan 2022 at 10:23, Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 12:57:25AM +0100, zimoun wrote:
> >> On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 at 13:41, manolis837@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Judging that the Hurd, aarch64 and powerpc are all have Guix working on
> > them I assume it's working well enough that we can close this bug.
>
> Therefore, I am closing.
>
>
> Thanks,
> simon
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1002 bytes --]