* [bug#38390] Starting 'core-updates'? [not found] <87mua8sma4.fsf@devup.no> @ 2020-02-13 15:18 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen 2020-02-14 15:18 ` Marius Bakke 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen @ 2020-02-13 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marius Bakke; +Cc: guix-devel, 38390 Marius Bakke writes: Hello Marius, > The 'core-updates' branch is starting to look pretty good, and I am > happy to report that it "works for me". :-) > > Some of the big changes include: > I suggest that we set a "freeze" date shortly after FOSDEM to start > integrating it. Are there other branches that should be included? > Maybe wip-bootstrap Definately maybe! I think that Timothy, Ludo and I have finally done what set out to do (see https://bugs.gnu.org/38390). I have squashed the remaining squash-commits and freshly rebased `wip-bootstrap' on core-updates, so I think that from our point of view we are ready for merge. WYDT? Greetings, janneke -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [bug#38390] Starting 'core-updates'? 2020-02-13 15:18 ` [bug#38390] Starting 'core-updates'? Jan Nieuwenhuizen @ 2020-02-14 15:18 ` Marius Bakke 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Marius Bakke @ 2020-02-14 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen; +Cc: guix-devel, 38390 [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1095 bytes --] Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> writes: > Marius Bakke writes: > > Hello Marius, > >> The 'core-updates' branch is starting to look pretty good, and I am >> happy to report that it "works for me". :-) >> >> Some of the big changes include: > >> I suggest that we set a "freeze" date shortly after FOSDEM to start >> integrating it. Are there other branches that should be included? > >> Maybe wip-bootstrap > > Definately maybe! I think that Timothy, Ludo and I have finally done > what set out to do (see https://bugs.gnu.org/38390). > > I have squashed the remaining squash-commits and freshly rebased > `wip-bootstrap' on core-updates, so I think that from our point of view > we are ready for merge. WYDT? Excellent, really looking forward to seeing this merged! Cutting the bootstrap seed down to ~60 MiB is nothing short of amazing. I think that with this branch merged as well as the glibc&binutils update from <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/39456> we are ready to start the 'core-updates' branch. \o/ We still need to change the default Guile to 3.0. Any takers? :-) [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 487 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-02-14 15:19 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <87mua8sma4.fsf@devup.no> 2020-02-13 15:18 ` [bug#38390] Starting 'core-updates'? Jan Nieuwenhuizen 2020-02-14 15:18 ` Marius Bakke
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).