* [bug#38390] Starting 'core-updates'?
[not found] <87mua8sma4.fsf@devup.no>
@ 2020-02-13 15:18 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2020-02-14 15:18 ` Marius Bakke
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen @ 2020-02-13 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marius Bakke; +Cc: guix-devel, 38390
Marius Bakke writes:
Hello Marius,
> The 'core-updates' branch is starting to look pretty good, and I am
> happy to report that it "works for me". :-)
>
> Some of the big changes include:
> I suggest that we set a "freeze" date shortly after FOSDEM to start
> integrating it. Are there other branches that should be included?
> Maybe wip-bootstrap
Definately maybe! I think that Timothy, Ludo and I have finally done
what set out to do (see https://bugs.gnu.org/38390).
I have squashed the remaining squash-commits and freshly rebased
`wip-bootstrap' on core-updates, so I think that from our point of view
we are ready for merge. WYDT?
Greetings,
janneke
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [bug#38390] Starting 'core-updates'?
2020-02-13 15:18 ` [bug#38390] Starting 'core-updates'? Jan Nieuwenhuizen
@ 2020-02-14 15:18 ` Marius Bakke
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Marius Bakke @ 2020-02-14 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen; +Cc: guix-devel, 38390
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1095 bytes --]
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> writes:
> Marius Bakke writes:
>
> Hello Marius,
>
>> The 'core-updates' branch is starting to look pretty good, and I am
>> happy to report that it "works for me". :-)
>>
>> Some of the big changes include:
>
>> I suggest that we set a "freeze" date shortly after FOSDEM to start
>> integrating it. Are there other branches that should be included?
>
>> Maybe wip-bootstrap
>
> Definately maybe! I think that Timothy, Ludo and I have finally done
> what set out to do (see https://bugs.gnu.org/38390).
>
> I have squashed the remaining squash-commits and freshly rebased
> `wip-bootstrap' on core-updates, so I think that from our point of view
> we are ready for merge. WYDT?
Excellent, really looking forward to seeing this merged! Cutting the
bootstrap seed down to ~60 MiB is nothing short of amazing.
I think that with this branch merged as well as the glibc&binutils
update from <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/39456> we are ready to
start the 'core-updates' branch. \o/
We still need to change the default Guile to 3.0. Any takers? :-)
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 487 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-02-14 15:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <87mua8sma4.fsf@devup.no>
2020-02-13 15:18 ` [bug#38390] Starting 'core-updates'? Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2020-02-14 15:18 ` Marius Bakke
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).