From: Julien Lepiller <julien@lepiller.eu>
To: pukkamustard <pukkamustard@posteo.net>, 49868@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#49868] [PATCH 0/2] guix: dune-build-system: Add a profile parameter.
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 07:06:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <36A316B4-720C-4753-AFFC-DBC68DBE5EF4@lepiller.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86y288yavn.fsf@posteo.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1228 bytes --]
Instead of reverting, coull you senl a patch on top of master, that simply replaces the flag?
Le 7 septembre 2021 05:33:39 GMT-04:00, pukkamustard <pukkamustard@posteo.net> a écrit :
>
>I suggest reverting commit 33a1ec29fa0ad72c61cef13c8af08c847eb399c1
>('guix: dune-build-system: Add a profile parameter.') and instead
>applying attached patch.
>
>The attached patch sets the '--release' flag instead of '--profile
>release'. From 'dune --help':
>
>--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>--release
> Put dune into a reproducible release mode. This is in fact a
> shorthand for --root . --ignore-promoted-rules --no-config
> --profile release --always-show-command-line
> --promote-install-files --default-target @install. You should use
> this option for release builds. For instance, you must use this
> option in your <package>.opam files. Except if you already use -p,
> as -p implies this option.
>--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
>I think this is what we want.
>
>Setting '--profile release' was not enough and was causing
>inconsistencies with packages that were building with the '-p' flag.
>
>-pukkamustard
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1531 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-07 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-04 8:04 [bug#49868] [PATCH 0/2] guix: dune-build-system: Add a profile parameter pukkamustard
2021-08-04 8:08 ` [bug#49868] [PATCH 1/2] " pukkamustard
2021-08-04 8:08 ` [bug#49868] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: ocaml4.07-base: Remove unnecessary arguments pukkamustard
2021-08-09 2:17 ` [bug#49868] [PATCH 0/2] guix: dune-build-system: Add a profile parameter Julien Lepiller
2021-08-09 7:17 ` pukkamustard
2021-08-09 7:19 ` [bug#49868] [PATCH v2 1/2] " pukkamustard
2021-08-09 7:19 ` [bug#49868] [PATCH v2 2/2] gnu: ocaml4.07-base: Remove unnecessary arguments pukkamustard
2021-08-20 22:09 ` bug#49868: [PATCH 0/2] guix: dune-build-system: Add a profile parameter Julien Lepiller
2021-08-24 6:52 ` [bug#49868] " pukkamustard
2021-08-24 7:13 ` pukkamustard
2021-08-24 7:51 ` pukkamustard
2021-09-07 9:33 ` pukkamustard
2021-09-07 11:06 ` Julien Lepiller [this message]
2021-09-07 11:46 ` pukkamustard
2021-09-07 13:03 ` Julien Lepiller
2021-09-07 18:11 ` pukkamustard
2021-09-07 22:03 ` Julien Lepiller
2021-09-08 8:24 ` pukkamustard
2021-09-08 11:45 ` Julien Lepiller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=36A316B4-720C-4753-AFFC-DBC68DBE5EF4@lepiller.eu \
--to=julien@lepiller.eu \
--cc=49868@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=pukkamustard@posteo.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).