Licence of the Guix blog posts

Licence of the Guix blog posts

[Ludovic Courtès]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1183 bytes --]

Hello Guix!

You might remember that I started long ago asking people who had
contributed to the blog whether they would agree to licensing their work
under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant
Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts¹.

I did not get replies from Danny Milosavljevic and Laura Lazzati²;
everyone else agreed publicly.

In the meantime, we got a new blog post³ with lots of contributors,
thanks to Simon’s work.  Unfortunately I think we did not discuss the
licensing terms.

Therefore, I propose to apply the following patch, which leaves out a
couple of posts as “unlicensed”.  From there on, we’ll have consistent
free licensing by default.

Thoughts?

Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the “10 years of
stories” post asking if they agree with the licensing?  :-)  No rush,
though the sooner the more likely we are to get an answer.

Ludo’.

¹ https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-02/msg00059.html
² https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-07/msg00059.html
³ https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2022/10-years-of-stories-behind-guix/


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/x-patch, Size: 3055 bytes --]

diff --git a/website/apps/blog/templates/post.scm b/website/apps/blog/templates/post.scm
index de02c6c..0d6b08e 100644
--- a/website/apps/blog/templates/post.scm
+++ b/website/apps/blog/templates/post.scm
@@ -60,4 +60,19 @@
 		#:label tag
 		#:url (guix-url (tag-url-path tag)))
 	       " ")) ; NOTE: Force space for readability in non-CSS browsers.
-	    (sort tags tag-first?))))))))
+	    (sort tags tag-first?)))
+
+        (div
+         (@ (class "license"))
+         ,(G_ `(p "Unless otherwise stated, blog posts on this site are
+copyrighted by their respective authors and published under the terms of
+the " ,(G_
+                    `(a (@ (href "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"))
+                        "CC-BY-SA 4.0"))
+                  " license and those of the "
+                  ,(G_
+                    `(a (@ (href
+                            "https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.3.html"))
+                        "GNU Free Documentation License"))
+                  " (version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections, no
+Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts)."))))))))
diff --git a/website/posts/10y-birthday-stories.md b/website/posts/10y-birthday-stories.md
index 40f6eaf..1c64982 100644
--- a/website/posts/10y-birthday-stories.md
+++ b/website/posts/10y-birthday-stories.md
@@ -809,3 +809,5 @@ operating system configuration management.  Guix is highly customizable
 and hackable through [Guile](https://www.gnu.org/software/guile)
 programming interfaces and extensions to the
 [Scheme](http://schemers.org) language.
+
+> _This post does not yet carry an agreed-upon license._
diff --git a/website/posts/bootstrapping-rust.md b/website/posts/bootstrapping-rust.md
index 6cb9b40..a44a271 100644
--- a/website/posts/bootstrapping-rust.md
+++ b/website/posts/bootstrapping-rust.md
@@ -104,3 +104,5 @@ management, and is highly customizable and hackable.
 GuixSD can be used on an i686, x86_64, ARMv7, and AArch64 machines.  It
 is also possible to use Guix on top of an already installed GNU/Linux
 system, including on mips64el and aarch64.
+
+> _This post does not yet carry an agreed-upon license._
diff --git a/website/posts/documentation-video-creation-2019.md b/website/posts/documentation-video-creation-2019.md
index 1217399..61bd853 100644
--- a/website/posts/documentation-video-creation-2019.md
+++ b/website/posts/documentation-video-creation-2019.md
@@ -92,3 +92,5 @@ operating system configuration management.  Guix is highly customizable
 and hackable through [Guile](https://www.gnu.org/software/guile)
 programming interfaces and extensions to the
 [Scheme](http://schemers.org) language.
+
+> _This post does not yet carry an agreed-upon license._
diff --git a/website/static/blog/css/post.css b/website/static/blog/css/post.css
index 57d7f0d..95035ba 100644
--- a/website/static/blog/css/post.css
+++ b/website/static/blog/css/post.css
@@ -38,3 +38,8 @@ article {
 article.limit-width {
     max-width: 720px;
 }
+
+.license {
+    font-size: 0.8em;
+    line-height: 1.4em;
+}

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 853 bytes --]

Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts

[Ekaitz Zarraga]

Hi,

> 
> Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the “10 years of
> stories” post asking if they agree with the licensing? :-) No rush,
> though the sooner the more likely we are to get an answer.


I'm one of them.
You can use what I wrote with the license you prefer.
Consider it yours.

Cheers,
Ekaitz

Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts

[Maxim Cournoyer]

Hi,

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> Hello Guix!
>
> You might remember that I started long ago asking people who had
> contributed to the blog whether they would agree to licensing their work
> under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant
> Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts¹.
>
> I did not get replies from Danny Milosavljevic and Laura Lazzati²;
> everyone else agreed publicly.

Perhaps try one last time; Danny is still around, I think.

> In the meantime, we got a new blog post³ with lots of contributors,
> thanks to Simon’s work.  Unfortunately I think we did not discuss the
> licensing terms.
>
> Therefore, I propose to apply the following patch, which leaves out a
> couple of posts as “unlicensed”.  From there on, we’ll have consistent
> free licensing by default.
>
> Thoughts?

LGTM.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts

[Andreas Enge]

Am Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 06:22:15PM +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> contributed to the blog whether they would agree to licensing their work
> under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant
> Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts¹.
> 
> Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the “10 years of
> stories” post asking if they agree with the licensing?

Fine for me, of course.

Andreas

Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts

[Vagrant Cascadian]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 625 bytes --]

On 2022-11-28, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> You might remember that I started long ago asking people who had
> contributed to the blog whether they would agree to licensing their work
> under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant
> Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts¹.
...
> Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the “10 years of
> stories” post asking if they agree with the licensing?  :-)  No rush,
> though the sooner the more likely we are to get an answer.

Happy for my contribution to be under those licensing terms!

live well,
  vagrant

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]

Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts

[pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)]

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
> Therefore, I propose to apply the following patch, which leaves out a

Yes!  The patch looks good.  I‘m fine with that license.

Regards,
Florian

Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi!

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> skribis:

> Therefore, I propose to apply the following patch, which leaves out a
> couple of posts as “unlicensed”.  From there on, we’ll have consistent
> free licensing by default.

Thanks to everyone who provided feedback.  I pushed the patch.

Let’s see if we can eventually address the remaining unlicensed posts,
in particular the 10 years one.

Ludo’.

Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts

[zimoun]

Hi Ludo,

Thanks for this clarification.  It reminds me hpc.guix.info posts. :-)

On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 at 18:22, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:

> Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the “10 years of
> stories” post asking if they agree with the licensing?  :-)  No rush,
> though the sooner the more likely we are to get an answer.

I will do my best this week-end.


Cheers,
simon

Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts

[Simon Tournier]

Hi,

On Fri, 02 Dec 2022 at 17:06, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 at 18:22, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the “10 years of
>> stories” post asking if they agree with the licensing?  :-)  No rush,
>> though the sooner the more likely we are to get an answer.
>
> I will do my best this week-end.

Ouch, time is flying!  I did today.

Cheers,
simon

Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts

[Thiago Jung Bauermann]

Hello Ludo,

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> You might remember that I started long ago asking people who had
> contributed to the blog whether they would agree to licensing their work
> under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant
> Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts¹.

>    ⋮

> Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the “10 years of
> stories” post asking if they agree with the licensing?  :-)  No rush,
> though the sooner the more likely we are to get an answer.

I'm one of the author of that post, and I agree with these licensing
terms.

Thank you for addressing this topic!

-- 
Thanks
Thiago

Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts

[John Kehayias]

Hello,

On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 06:22 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:

> Hello Guix!
>
> You might remember that I started long ago asking people who had
> contributed to the blog whether they would agree to licensing their work
> under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant
> Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts¹.
>
> I did not get replies from Danny Milosavljevic and Laura Lazzati²;
> everyone else agreed publicly.
>
> In the meantime, we got a new blog post³ with lots of contributors,
> thanks to Simon’s work.  Unfortunately I think we did not discuss the
> licensing terms.
>
> Therefore, I propose to apply the following patch, which leaves out a
> couple of posts as “unlicensed”.  From there on, we’ll have consistent
> free licensing by default.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the “10 years of
> stories” post asking if they agree with the licensing?  :-)  No rush,
> though the sooner the more likely we are to get an answer.
>

As an author for one of the paragraphs on the "10 years" blog post, consider this my agreement with these licensing terms.

Thanks for helping get this sorted!

John Kehayias

Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts

[Guillaume Le Vaillant]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1158 bytes --]

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> skribis:

> You might remember that I started long ago asking people who had
> contributed to the blog whether they would agree to licensing their work
> under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant
> Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts¹.
>
> I did not get replies from Danny Milosavljevic and Laura Lazzati²;
> everyone else agreed publicly.
>
> In the meantime, we got a new blog post³ with lots of contributors,
> thanks to Simon’s work.  Unfortunately I think we did not discuss the
> licensing terms.
>
> Therefore, I propose to apply the following patch, which leaves out a
> couple of posts as “unlicensed”.  From there on, we’ll have consistent
> free licensing by default.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the “10 years of
> stories” post asking if they agree with the licensing?  :-)  No rush,
> though the sooner the more likely we are to get an answer.
>
> Ludo’.

Hi Ludo,

I wrote a paragraph for the "10 years of stories behind Guix" post, and
I agree with the proposed licensing.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 247 bytes --]

Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts

[Csepp]

I thought I agreed when I sent my part, but in case I haven't:
I agree to licensing your contribution under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL
version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts,
and no Back-Cover Texts.

Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts

[Csepp]

Csepp <raingloom@riseup.net> writes:

> I thought I agreed when I sent my part, but in case I haven't:
> I agree to licensing your contribution under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL
> version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts,
> and no Back-Cover Texts.

s/your/mine/

I copied the text from the email I was sent and apparently didn't edit
it properly.

Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts

[Lars-Dominik Braun]

Hi,

> Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the “10 years of
> stories” post asking if they agree with the licensing?  :-)  No rush,
> though the sooner the more likely we are to get an answer.
I’m also fine with the terms proposed here.

Lars

Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts

[Luis Felipe]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 187 bytes --]

> Do you agree to licensing your contribution under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts?

Yes, I agree.

[-- Attachment #1.2: publickey - luis.felipe.la@protonmail.com - 0x12DE1598.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 1722 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 509 bytes --]

Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts

[Björn Höfling]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1564 bytes --]

On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 18:22:15 +0100
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:

> Hello Guix!
> 
> You might remember that I started long ago asking people who had
> contributed to the blog whether they would agree to licensing their
> work under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no
> Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts¹.
> 
> I did not get replies from Danny Milosavljevic and Laura Lazzati²;
> everyone else agreed publicly.
> 
> In the meantime, we got a new blog post³ with lots of contributors,
> thanks to Simon’s work.  Unfortunately I think we did not discuss the
> licensing terms.
> 
> Therefore, I propose to apply the following patch, which leaves out a
> couple of posts as “unlicensed”.  From there on, we’ll have consistent
> free licensing by default.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the “10 years
> of stories” post asking if they agree with the licensing?  :-)  No
> rush, though the sooner the more likely we are to get an answer.
> 
> Ludo’.
> 
> ¹ https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-02/msg00059.html
> ² https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-07/msg00059.html
> ³ https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2022/10-years-of-stories-behind-guix/
> 

I thought I agreed when I sent my part, but in case I haven't:
I agree to licensing your contribution under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL
version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts,
and no Back-Cover Texts.

Björn

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

Re: License of “10 years of stories behind Guix”

[Konrad Hinsen]

Dear lawyers of the world,

I agree for my contribution to the blog post

    https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2022/10-years-of-stories-behind-guix/

to be published under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later (or
whatever other open license the maintainers of the blog might prefer in
the future).

Konrad.

Re: License of “10 years of stories behind Guix”

[Hartmut Goebel]

Dear lawyers of the world,

I agree for my contribution to the blog post

     https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2022/10-years-of-stories-behind-guix/

to be published under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later (or
whatever other open license the maintainers of the blog might prefer in
the future).


-- 
Regards
Hartmut Goebel

| Hartmut Goebel          | h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com               |
| www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |

Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts

[Janneke Nieuwenhuizen]

Ludovic Courtès writes:

Hello!

Thanks Simon for pinging me!

> You might remember that I started long ago asking people who had
> contributed to the blog whether they would agree to licensing their work
> under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant
> Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts¹.
[..]
> Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the “10 years of
> stories” post asking if they agree with the licensing?  :-)  No rush,
> though the sooner the more likely we are to get an answer.

Sure, I'm happy for my blog contributions to be licensed under these
terms.

Greetings,
Janneke

-- 
Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org>  | GNU LilyPond https://LilyPond.org
Freelance IT https://www.JoyOfSource.com | Avatar® https://AvatarAcademy.com

Licence of the Guix blog posts

[Arun Isaac]

Yes, I agree for my contribution to the blog posts to be published under
the licenses CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later (with no
Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts).

Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts

[Alice BRENON]

Hello everyone,

Sorry for the late reply, but as I've been asked by Simon to provide a public
answer I managed to retrieve this message to reply that I do agree with the new
licensing of CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL 1.3 for my contribution to the "10 years of
stories" : )

Have a nice day folks,

Alice

Le Mon, 28 Nov 2022 18:22:15 +0100,
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> a écrit :

> Hello Guix!
> 
> You might remember that I started long ago asking people who had
> contributed to the blog whether they would agree to licensing their
> work under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no
> Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts¹.
> 
> I did not get replies from Danny Milosavljevic and Laura Lazzati²;
> everyone else agreed publicly.
> 
> In the meantime, we got a new blog post³ with lots of contributors,
> thanks to Simon’s work.  Unfortunately I think we did not discuss the
> licensing terms.
> 
> Therefore, I propose to apply the following patch, which leaves out a
> couple of posts as “unlicensed”.  From there on, we’ll have consistent
> free licensing by default.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the “10 years
> of stories” post asking if they agree with the licensing?  :-)  No
> rush, though the sooner the more likely we are to get an answer.
> 
> Ludo’.
> 
> ¹ https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-02/msg00059.html
> ² https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-07/msg00059.html
> ³ https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2022/10-years-of-stories-behind-guix/
> 

Re: Licence of the Guix blog posts

[Eric Bavier]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 673 bytes --]

On Mon, 2022-11-28 at 18:22 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> 
> Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the “10 years of
> stories” post asking if they agree with the licensing?  :-)  No rush,
> though the sooner the more likely we are to get an answer.
> 
> Ludo’.
> 
> ¹ https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-02/msg00059.html
> ² https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-07/msg00059.html
> ³ https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2022/10-years-of-stories-behind-guix/
> 

Yes, I agree for my contribution to the blog posts with the license
under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later.

Thanks,
`~Eric Bavier


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 858 bytes --]