* bug#68229: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite [not found] <3393@guix-ci.nnrss> @ 2024-01-03 16:29 ` Maxim Cournoyer 2024-01-03 16:53 ` Efraim Flashner 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Maxim Cournoyer @ 2024-01-03 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 68229; +Cc: Efraim Flashner Hello, cuirass@gnu.org (Cuirass) writes: > <p>The build <b>go.powerpc64le-linux</b> for specification <b>master</b> is broken. You can find the detailed information about this build <a > href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details">here</a>.</p> > > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details The test failure is: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- --- FAIL: TestScript (0.00s) --- FAIL: TestScript/vendor_complex (2.07s) script_test.go:193: # smoke test for complex build configuration (1.990s) > go build -o complex.exe complex > [exec:gccgo] go build -compiler=gccgo -o complex.exe complex [stderr] # complex gccgo: error: unrecognized command-line option '-rpath=/gnu/store/qj6cnccz6vsffqa32rviw4zaqgh7xd6q-gcc-11.3.0-lib/lib' [exit status 2] FAIL: testdata/script/vendor_complex.txt:5: unexpected command failure FAIL FAIL cmd/go 46.068s --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- I don't see an obvious relationship with the recent commit touching gccgo-12, but I'm CC'ing its author in case it could be. -- Thanks, Maxim ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* bug#68229: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite 2024-01-03 16:29 ` bug#68229: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite Maxim Cournoyer @ 2024-01-03 16:53 ` Efraim Flashner 2024-01-03 17:59 ` Maxim Cournoyer 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Efraim Flashner @ 2024-01-03 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Maxim Cournoyer; +Cc: 68229-done [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1633 bytes --] On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:29:50AM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Hello, > > cuirass@gnu.org (Cuirass) writes: > > > <p>The build <b>go.powerpc64le-linux</b> for specification <b>master</b> is broken. You can find the detailed information about this build <a > > href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details">here</a>.</p> > > > > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details > > The test failure is: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > --- FAIL: TestScript (0.00s) > --- FAIL: TestScript/vendor_complex (2.07s) > script_test.go:193: > # smoke test for complex build configuration (1.990s) > > go build -o complex.exe complex > > [exec:gccgo] go build -compiler=gccgo -o complex.exe complex > [stderr] > # complex > gccgo: error: unrecognized command-line option '-rpath=/gnu/store/qj6cnccz6vsffqa32rviw4zaqgh7xd6q-gcc-11.3.0-lib/lib' > [exit status 2] > FAIL: testdata/script/vendor_complex.txt:5: unexpected command failure > > FAIL > FAIL cmd/go 46.068s > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > I don't see an obvious relationship with the recent commit touching > gccgo-12, but I'm CC'ing its author in case it could be. This one is go-1.14. That one already failed for ppc64le. -- Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> רנשלפ םירפא GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* bug#68229: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite 2024-01-03 16:53 ` Efraim Flashner @ 2024-01-03 17:59 ` Maxim Cournoyer [not found] ` <EC18D8A8-75C1-49D1-833B-B62F8D955E29@flashner.co.il> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Maxim Cournoyer @ 2024-01-03 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Efraim Flashner; +Cc: 68229 Hello, Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes: > On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:29:50AM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >> Hello, >> >> cuirass@gnu.org (Cuirass) writes: >> >> > <p>The build <b>go.powerpc64le-linux</b> for specification >> > <b>master</b> is broken. You can find the detailed information >> > about this build <a >> > href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details">here</a>.</p> >> > >> > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details >> >> The test failure is: >> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> --- FAIL: TestScript (0.00s) >> --- FAIL: TestScript/vendor_complex (2.07s) >> script_test.go:193: >> # smoke test for complex build configuration (1.990s) >> > go build -o complex.exe complex >> > [exec:gccgo] go build -compiler=gccgo -o complex.exe complex >> [stderr] >> # complex >> gccgo: error: unrecognized command-line option >> '-rpath=/gnu/store/qj6cnccz6vsffqa32rviw4zaqgh7xd6q-gcc-11.3.0-lib/lib' >> [exit status 2] >> FAIL: testdata/script/vendor_complex.txt:5: unexpected command failure >> >> FAIL >> FAIL cmd/go 46.068s >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >> >> I don't see an obvious relationship with the recent commit touching >> gccgo-12, but I'm CC'ing its author in case it could be. > > This one is go-1.14. That one already failed for ppc64le. OK; Cuirass got it wrong again. Should we leave the ticket open though, since it's an actual problem? -- Thanks, Maxim ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <EC18D8A8-75C1-49D1-833B-B62F8D955E29@flashner.co.il>]
* bug#68229: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite [not found] ` <EC18D8A8-75C1-49D1-833B-B62F8D955E29@flashner.co.il> @ 2024-01-10 4:31 ` Maxim Cournoyer 2024-01-10 5:30 ` Efraim Flashner 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Maxim Cournoyer @ 2024-01-10 4:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Efraim Flashner; +Cc: 68229 reopen 68229 quit Hi, Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes: > On January 3, 2024 5:59:22 PM UTC, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> wrote: >>Hello, >> >>Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes: >> >>> On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:29:50AM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> cuirass@gnu.org (Cuirass) writes: >>>> >>>> > <p>The build <b>go.powerpc64le-linux</b> for specification >>>> > <b>master</b> is broken. You can find the detailed information >>>> > about this build <a >>>> > href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details">here</a>.</p> >>>> > >>>> > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details >>>> >>>> The test failure is: >>>> >>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >>>> --- FAIL: TestScript (0.00s) >>>> --- FAIL: TestScript/vendor_complex (2.07s) >>>> script_test.go:193: >>>> # smoke test for complex build configuration (1.990s) >>>> > go build -o complex.exe complex >>>> > [exec:gccgo] go build -compiler=gccgo -o complex.exe complex >>>> [stderr] >>>> # complex >>>> gccgo: error: unrecognized command-line option >>>> '-rpath=/gnu/store/qj6cnccz6vsffqa32rviw4zaqgh7xd6q-gcc-11.3.0-lib/lib' >>>> [exit status 2] >>>> FAIL: testdata/script/vendor_complex.txt:5: unexpected command failure >>>> >>>> FAIL >>>> FAIL cmd/go 46.068s >>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >>>> >>>> I don't see an obvious relationship with the recent commit touching >>>> gccgo-12, but I'm CC'ing its author in case it could be. >>> >>> This one is go-1.14. That one already failed for ppc64le. >> >>OK; Cuirass got it wrong again. Should we leave the ticket open though, >>since it's an actual problem? >> > Fine with me. We should probably remove go-1.14 anyway if nothing > depends on it. And either make it build on ppc64le or mark it not > supported otherwise. Alright, I'll leave this open for someone to pick up. The task would be to remove go-1.14, incorporating it into go-1.16, which currently inherits from it. Any takers? -- Thanks, Maxim ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* bug#68229: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite 2024-01-10 4:31 ` Maxim Cournoyer @ 2024-01-10 5:30 ` Efraim Flashner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Efraim Flashner @ 2024-01-10 5:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Maxim Cournoyer; +Cc: 68229 On January 10, 2024 4:31:07 AM UTC, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> wrote: >reopen 68229 >quit > >Hi, > >Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes: > >> On January 3, 2024 5:59:22 PM UTC, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> wrote: >>>Hello, >>> >>>Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes: >>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:29:50AM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> cuirass@gnu.org (Cuirass) writes: >>>>> >>>>> > <p>The build <b>go.powerpc64le-linux</b> for specification >>>>> > <b>master</b> is broken. You can find the detailed information >>>>> > about this build <a >>>>> > href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details">here</a>.</p> >>>>> > >>>>> > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details >>>>> >>>>> The test failure is: >>>>> >>>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >>>>> --- FAIL: TestScript (0.00s) >>>>> --- FAIL: TestScript/vendor_complex (2.07s) >>>>> script_test.go:193: >>>>> # smoke test for complex build configuration (1.990s) >>>>> > go build -o complex.exe complex >>>>> > [exec:gccgo] go build -compiler=gccgo -o complex.exe complex >>>>> [stderr] >>>>> # complex >>>>> gccgo: error: unrecognized command-line option >>>>> '-rpath=/gnu/store/qj6cnccz6vsffqa32rviw4zaqgh7xd6q-gcc-11.3.0-lib/lib' >>>>> [exit status 2] >>>>> FAIL: testdata/script/vendor_complex.txt:5: unexpected command failure >>>>> >>>>> FAIL >>>>> FAIL cmd/go 46.068s >>>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >>>>> >>>>> I don't see an obvious relationship with the recent commit touching >>>>> gccgo-12, but I'm CC'ing its author in case it could be. >>>> >>>> This one is go-1.14. That one already failed for ppc64le. >>> >>>OK; Cuirass got it wrong again. Should we leave the ticket open though, >>>since it's an actual problem? >>> >> Fine with me. We should probably remove go-1.14 anyway if nothing >> depends on it. And either make it build on ppc64le or mark it not >> supported otherwise. > >Alright, I'll leave this open for someone to pick up. The task would be >to remove go-1.14, incorporating it into go-1.16, which currently >inherits from it. Any takers? > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/68300 Although it currently rebuilds all go packages. I should probably fix that. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-10 5:31 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <3393@guix-ci.nnrss> 2024-01-03 16:29 ` bug#68229: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite Maxim Cournoyer 2024-01-03 16:53 ` Efraim Flashner 2024-01-03 17:59 ` Maxim Cournoyer [not found] ` <EC18D8A8-75C1-49D1-833B-B62F8D955E29@flashner.co.il> 2024-01-10 4:31 ` Maxim Cournoyer 2024-01-10 5:30 ` Efraim Flashner
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).