unofficial mirror of bug-guix@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* bug#68229: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite
       [not found] <3393@guix-ci.nnrss>
@ 2024-01-03 16:29 ` Maxim Cournoyer
  2024-01-03 16:53   ` Efraim Flashner
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Maxim Cournoyer @ 2024-01-03 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 68229; +Cc: Efraim Flashner

Hello,

cuirass@gnu.org (Cuirass) writes:

> <p>The build <b>go.powerpc64le-linux</b> for specification <b>master</b> is broken. You can find the detailed information about this build <a
> href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details">here</a>.</p>
>
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details

The test failure is:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
--- FAIL: TestScript (0.00s)
    --- FAIL: TestScript/vendor_complex (2.07s)
        script_test.go:193: 
            # smoke test for complex build configuration (1.990s)
            > go build -o complex.exe complex
            > [exec:gccgo] go build -compiler=gccgo -o complex.exe complex
            [stderr]
            # complex
            gccgo: error: unrecognized command-line option '-rpath=/gnu/store/qj6cnccz6vsffqa32rviw4zaqgh7xd6q-gcc-11.3.0-lib/lib'
            [exit status 2]
            FAIL: testdata/script/vendor_complex.txt:5: unexpected command failure
            
FAIL
FAIL	cmd/go	46.068s
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

I don't see an obvious relationship with the recent commit touching
gccgo-12, but I'm CC'ing its author in case it could be.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* bug#68229: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite
  2024-01-03 16:29 ` bug#68229: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite Maxim Cournoyer
@ 2024-01-03 16:53   ` Efraim Flashner
  2024-01-03 17:59     ` Maxim Cournoyer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Efraim Flashner @ 2024-01-03 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Maxim Cournoyer; +Cc: 68229-done

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1633 bytes --]

On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:29:50AM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> cuirass@gnu.org (Cuirass) writes:
> 
> > <p>The build <b>go.powerpc64le-linux</b> for specification <b>master</b> is broken. You can find the detailed information about this build <a
> > href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details">here</a>.</p>
> >
> > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details
> 
> The test failure is:
> 
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> --- FAIL: TestScript (0.00s)
>     --- FAIL: TestScript/vendor_complex (2.07s)
>         script_test.go:193: 
>             # smoke test for complex build configuration (1.990s)
>             > go build -o complex.exe complex
>             > [exec:gccgo] go build -compiler=gccgo -o complex.exe complex
>             [stderr]
>             # complex
>             gccgo: error: unrecognized command-line option '-rpath=/gnu/store/qj6cnccz6vsffqa32rviw4zaqgh7xd6q-gcc-11.3.0-lib/lib'
>             [exit status 2]
>             FAIL: testdata/script/vendor_complex.txt:5: unexpected command failure
>             
> FAIL
> FAIL	cmd/go	46.068s
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> 
> I don't see an obvious relationship with the recent commit touching
> gccgo-12, but I'm CC'ing its author in case it could be.

This one is go-1.14. That one already failed for ppc64le.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   רנשלפ םירפא
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* bug#68229: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite
  2024-01-03 16:53   ` Efraim Flashner
@ 2024-01-03 17:59     ` Maxim Cournoyer
       [not found]       ` <EC18D8A8-75C1-49D1-833B-B62F8D955E29@flashner.co.il>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Maxim Cournoyer @ 2024-01-03 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Efraim Flashner; +Cc: 68229

Hello,

Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:

> On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:29:50AM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> cuirass@gnu.org (Cuirass) writes:
>> 
>> > <p>The build <b>go.powerpc64le-linux</b> for specification
>> > <b>master</b> is broken. You can find the detailed information
>> > about this build <a
>> > href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details">here</a>.</p>
>> >
>> > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details
>> 
>> The test failure is:
>> 
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> --- FAIL: TestScript (0.00s)
>>     --- FAIL: TestScript/vendor_complex (2.07s)
>>         script_test.go:193: 
>>             # smoke test for complex build configuration (1.990s)
>>             > go build -o complex.exe complex
>>             > [exec:gccgo] go build -compiler=gccgo -o complex.exe complex
>>             [stderr]
>>             # complex
>>             gccgo: error: unrecognized command-line option
>> '-rpath=/gnu/store/qj6cnccz6vsffqa32rviw4zaqgh7xd6q-gcc-11.3.0-lib/lib'
>>             [exit status 2]
>>             FAIL: testdata/script/vendor_complex.txt:5: unexpected command failure
>>             
>> FAIL
>> FAIL	cmd/go	46.068s
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>> 
>> I don't see an obvious relationship with the recent commit touching
>> gccgo-12, but I'm CC'ing its author in case it could be.
>
> This one is go-1.14. That one already failed for ppc64le.

OK; Cuirass got it wrong again.  Should we leave the ticket open though,
since it's an actual problem?

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* bug#68229: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite
       [not found]       ` <EC18D8A8-75C1-49D1-833B-B62F8D955E29@flashner.co.il>
@ 2024-01-10  4:31         ` Maxim Cournoyer
  2024-01-10  5:30           ` Efraim Flashner
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Maxim Cournoyer @ 2024-01-10  4:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Efraim Flashner; +Cc: 68229

reopen 68229
quit

Hi,

Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:

> On January 3, 2024 5:59:22 PM UTC, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> wrote:
>>Hello,
>>
>>Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:29:50AM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>> 
>>>> cuirass@gnu.org (Cuirass) writes:
>>>> 
>>>> > <p>The build <b>go.powerpc64le-linux</b> for specification
>>>> > <b>master</b> is broken. You can find the detailed information
>>>> > about this build <a
>>>> > href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details">here</a>.</p>
>>>> >
>>>> > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details
>>>> 
>>>> The test failure is:
>>>> 
>>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>>>> --- FAIL: TestScript (0.00s)
>>>>     --- FAIL: TestScript/vendor_complex (2.07s)
>>>>         script_test.go:193: 
>>>>             # smoke test for complex build configuration (1.990s)
>>>>             > go build -o complex.exe complex
>>>>             > [exec:gccgo] go build -compiler=gccgo -o complex.exe complex
>>>>             [stderr]
>>>>             # complex
>>>>             gccgo: error: unrecognized command-line option
>>>> '-rpath=/gnu/store/qj6cnccz6vsffqa32rviw4zaqgh7xd6q-gcc-11.3.0-lib/lib'
>>>>             [exit status 2]
>>>>             FAIL: testdata/script/vendor_complex.txt:5: unexpected command failure
>>>>             
>>>> FAIL
>>>> FAIL	cmd/go	46.068s
>>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>>> 
>>>> I don't see an obvious relationship with the recent commit touching
>>>> gccgo-12, but I'm CC'ing its author in case it could be.
>>>
>>> This one is go-1.14. That one already failed for ppc64le.
>>
>>OK; Cuirass got it wrong again.  Should we leave the ticket open though,
>>since it's an actual problem?
>>
> Fine with me. We should probably remove go-1.14 anyway if nothing
> depends on it. And either make it build on ppc64le or mark it not
> supported otherwise.

Alright, I'll leave this open for someone to pick up.  The task would be
to remove go-1.14, incorporating it into go-1.16, which currently
inherits from it.  Any takers?

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* bug#68229: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite
  2024-01-10  4:31         ` Maxim Cournoyer
@ 2024-01-10  5:30           ` Efraim Flashner
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Efraim Flashner @ 2024-01-10  5:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Maxim Cournoyer; +Cc: 68229



On January 10, 2024 4:31:07 AM UTC, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> wrote:
>reopen 68229
>quit
>
>Hi,
>
>Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:
>
>> On January 3, 2024 5:59:22 PM UTC, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>Hello,
>>>
>>>Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:29:50AM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>> 
>>>>> cuirass@gnu.org (Cuirass) writes:
>>>>> 
>>>>> > <p>The build <b>go.powerpc64le-linux</b> for specification
>>>>> > <b>master</b> is broken. You can find the detailed information
>>>>> > about this build <a
>>>>> > href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details">here</a>.</p>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details
>>>>> 
>>>>> The test failure is:
>>>>> 
>>>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>>>>> --- FAIL: TestScript (0.00s)
>>>>>     --- FAIL: TestScript/vendor_complex (2.07s)
>>>>>         script_test.go:193: 
>>>>>             # smoke test for complex build configuration (1.990s)
>>>>>             > go build -o complex.exe complex
>>>>>             > [exec:gccgo] go build -compiler=gccgo -o complex.exe complex
>>>>>             [stderr]
>>>>>             # complex
>>>>>             gccgo: error: unrecognized command-line option
>>>>> '-rpath=/gnu/store/qj6cnccz6vsffqa32rviw4zaqgh7xd6q-gcc-11.3.0-lib/lib'
>>>>>             [exit status 2]
>>>>>             FAIL: testdata/script/vendor_complex.txt:5: unexpected command failure
>>>>>             
>>>>> FAIL
>>>>> FAIL	cmd/go	46.068s
>>>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>>>> 
>>>>> I don't see an obvious relationship with the recent commit touching
>>>>> gccgo-12, but I'm CC'ing its author in case it could be.
>>>>
>>>> This one is go-1.14. That one already failed for ppc64le.
>>>
>>>OK; Cuirass got it wrong again.  Should we leave the ticket open though,
>>>since it's an actual problem?
>>>
>> Fine with me. We should probably remove go-1.14 anyway if nothing
>> depends on it. And either make it build on ppc64le or mark it not
>> supported otherwise.
>
>Alright, I'll leave this open for someone to pick up.  The task would be
>to remove go-1.14, incorporating it into go-1.16, which currently
>inherits from it.  Any takers?
>

https://issues.guix.gnu.org/68300

Although it currently rebuilds all go packages. I should probably fix that.
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-10  5:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <3393@guix-ci.nnrss>
2024-01-03 16:29 ` bug#68229: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite Maxim Cournoyer
2024-01-03 16:53   ` Efraim Flashner
2024-01-03 17:59     ` Maxim Cournoyer
     [not found]       ` <EC18D8A8-75C1-49D1-833B-B62F8D955E29@flashner.co.il>
2024-01-10  4:31         ` Maxim Cournoyer
2024-01-10  5:30           ` Efraim Flashner

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).