unofficial mirror of bug-guix@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
To: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com>
Cc: 53355@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#53355: guix shell --check: confusing error message
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 14:39:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h79slysd.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sftc4osu.fsf@gmail.com> (Chris Marusich's message of "Mon, 24 Jan 2022 16:55:13 -0800")

Hi Chris,

Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com> skribis:

> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> What’s confusing is that ‘--check’ does the same job whether or not
>> ‘--container’ is passed: it checks the behavior of your shell *outside*
>> a container.
>>
>> I think ‘--check’ should just do nothing when ‘--container’ is used,
>> possibly emitting a warning saying it’s not doing anything (patch
>> below).
>>
>> Now, the diagnostic is hopefully correct if you use, say, ‘--pure’
>> instead of ‘--container’.  Could you check whether this is the case?
>
> That sounds reasonable.  I tested your patch.  It now correctly emits a
> warning when both --container and --check are provided.

Great, I’ll commit it.

> First, I tried without --pure or --container.  Below, you can see that
> it claims LIBRARY_PATH is missing, but it does not seem to be missing:

[...]

> Next, I tried with --pure and --check - once again, it claims
> LIBRARY_PATH is missing, even though it does not seem to be missing:

It looks like the shell-check machinery is misdiagnosing things, as
Vagrant reported in <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/51466> (is this on
Debian too?).

Could you try the debugging tricks I proposed there?

TIA,
Ludo’.




  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-25 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-19  3:29 bug#53355: guix shell --check: confusing error message Chris Marusich
2022-01-24 14:35 ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-01-25  0:55   ` Chris Marusich
2022-01-25 13:39     ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2022-02-02  7:49       ` bug#51466: " Chris Marusich
2022-02-08  9:26         ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-02-13 23:17           ` Chris Marusich
2022-02-14  9:47             ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-03-08 19:07               ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-05-20 21:37                 ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-05-24  4:42               ` Chris Marusich
2022-06-13 10:03                 ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-06-19 20:40                   ` Chris Marusich
2022-06-20  7:34                     ` bug#51466: " Ludovic Courtès
2022-06-20 10:12                     ` bug#53355: " bokr
2022-06-20 17:56                       ` Bengt Richter
2022-06-20 23:27                         ` bug#51466: " Bengt Richter
2022-06-21  4:00                           ` Thiago Jung Bauermann via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2022-06-25  9:07                 ` Chris Marusich
2022-06-25  9:37                   ` bug#53355: bug#51466: " Maxime Devos
2022-06-25 16:52                     ` Chris Marusich
2022-06-25 17:40                       ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-25 20:06                         ` bug#51466: " bokr
2022-06-25 21:04                           ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-26 10:33                         ` Josselin Poiret via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2022-06-26 13:07                           ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-26 19:45                             ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2022-06-27 10:17                   ` bug#51466: " Ludovic Courtès
2022-06-27 10:34                     ` bug#53355: " Maxime Devos
2022-06-28  7:45                       ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-06-28 10:38                         ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-28 16:57                           ` bug#53355: " paren--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2022-06-28 17:31                             ` bug#51466: " Maxime Devos
2022-07-04  8:11                             ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-06-27 11:23                     ` bokr
2022-06-27 14:22                       ` bug#51466: bug#53355: " Bengt Richter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87h79slysd.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=ludo@gnu.org \
    --cc=53355@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=cmmarusich@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).