unofficial mirror of bug-guix@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* bug#67829: qtwebengine new failure on i686
@ 2023-12-14 20:33 Maxim Cournoyer
  2023-12-15  6:04 ` John Kehayias via Bug reports for GNU Guix
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Maxim Cournoyer @ 2023-12-14 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 67829; +Cc: John Kehayias

Hello,

qtwebengine was marked as newly failing by Cuirass on Berlin, as a
result to the xorg-server update in
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=8083c7abbf3a346162fcc4b8d5aa50555c0f3179.

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
v8_use_external_startup_data=false
CMake Error at /tmp/guix-build-qtwebengine-6.5.2.drv-0/qtwebengine-everywhere-src-6.5.2/cmake/Gn.cmake:75 (message):
  

  -- GN FAILED

  ERROR at //BUILD.gn:1652:1: Assertion failed.

  assert(

  ^-----

  'target_cpu=x86' is not supported for 'target_os=linux'.  Consider omitting
  'target_cpu' (default) or using 'target_cpu=x64' instead.

  See //BUILD.gn:1653:5:

      is_valid_x86_target || target_cpu != "x86" || v8_target_cpu == "arm",
      ^-------------------------------------------------------------------

  This is where it was set.

  1

ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

I don't see how the two would be related, but I've CC'd John in case
they'd have some hunch.

Perhaps some non-deterministic issue with the 'gn' build system?  It had
succeeded here: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2803939/details about a
week ago.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* bug#67829: qtwebengine new failure on i686
  2023-12-14 20:33 bug#67829: qtwebengine new failure on i686 Maxim Cournoyer
@ 2023-12-15  6:04 ` John Kehayias via Bug reports for GNU Guix
  2023-12-16 17:34   ` Efraim Flashner
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: John Kehayias via Bug reports for GNU Guix @ 2023-12-15  6:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Maxim Cournoyer; +Cc: 67829, Efraim Flashner

Hello Maxim,

On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 03:33 PM, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:

> Hello,
>
> qtwebengine was marked as newly failing by Cuirass on Berlin, as a

This "newly failing" is the same false alarm as we saw recently. I
think Cuirass gets confused on same package with different versions as
the only one I see on i686-linux building in the past year is v5.

> result to the xorg-server update in
> <https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=8083c7abbf3a346162fcc4b8d5aa50555c0f3179>.
>
> v8_use_external_startup_data=false
> CMake Error at /tmp/guix-build-qtwebengine-6.5.2.drv-0/qtwebengine-everywhere-src-6.5.2/cmake/Gn.cmake:75 (message):
>
>
>   -- GN FAILED
>
>   ERROR at //BUILD.gn:1652:1: Assertion failed.
>
>   assert(
>
>   ^-----
>
>   'target_cpu=x86' is not supported for 'target_os=linux'.  Consider omitting
>   'target_cpu' (default) or using 'target_cpu=x64' instead.
>
>   See //BUILD.gn:1653:5:
>
>       is_valid_x86_target || target_cpu != "x86" || v8_target_cpu == "arm",
>       ^-------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>   This is where it was set.
>
>   1
>
> ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
>
> I don't see how the two would be related, but I've CC'd John in case
> they'd have some hunch.
>
> Perhaps some non-deterministic issue with the 'gn' build system?  It had
> succeeded here: <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2803939/details> about a
> week ago.

As for the actual error, no idea (I saw the same thing when I noticed
the "new failure"). But I'm cc'ing Efraim as having figured out the
fix for the other package (sorry don't remember which, qt something)
on i686 recently...

John





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* bug#67829: qtwebengine new failure on i686
  2023-12-15  6:04 ` John Kehayias via Bug reports for GNU Guix
@ 2023-12-16 17:34   ` Efraim Flashner
  2023-12-19 16:46     ` Maxim Cournoyer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Efraim Flashner @ 2023-12-16 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: John Kehayias; +Cc: 67829, Maxim Cournoyer

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2910 bytes --]

On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 06:04:30AM +0000, John Kehayias wrote:
> Hello Maxim,
> 
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 03:33 PM, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> >
> > qtwebengine was marked as newly failing by Cuirass on Berlin, as a
> 
> This "newly failing" is the same false alarm as we saw recently. I
> think Cuirass gets confused on same package with different versions as
> the only one I see on i686-linux building in the past year is v5.
> 
> > result to the xorg-server update in
> > <https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=8083c7abbf3a346162fcc4b8d5aa50555c0f3179>.
> >
> > v8_use_external_startup_data=false
> > CMake Error at /tmp/guix-build-qtwebengine-6.5.2.drv-0/qtwebengine-everywhere-src-6.5.2/cmake/Gn.cmake:75 (message):
> >
> >
> >   -- GN FAILED
> >
> >   ERROR at //BUILD.gn:1652:1: Assertion failed.
> >
> >   assert(
> >
> >   ^-----
> >
> >   'target_cpu=x86' is not supported for 'target_os=linux'.  Consider omitting
> >   'target_cpu' (default) or using 'target_cpu=x64' instead.
> >
> >   See //BUILD.gn:1653:5:
> >
> >       is_valid_x86_target || target_cpu != "x86" || v8_target_cpu == "arm",
> >       ^-------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >   This is where it was set.
> >
> >   1
> >
> > ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
> >
> > I don't see how the two would be related, but I've CC'd John in case
> > they'd have some hunch.
> >
> > Perhaps some non-deterministic issue with the 'gn' build system?  It had
> > succeeded here: <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2803939/details> about a
> > week ago.
> 
> As for the actual error, no idea (I saw the same thing when I noticed
> the "new failure"). But I'm cc'ing Efraim as having figured out the
> fix for the other package (sorry don't remember which, qt something)
> on i686 recently...

Upstream chromium removed support for i686 so that's why it's failing.

https://sources.debian.org/src/qt6-webengine/6.6.1%2Bdfsg-1/debian/patches/support-i386.patch/
https://sources.debian.org/src/qt6-webengine/6.6.1%2Bdfsg-1/debian/patches/disable_32bit_node_check.patch/
https://sources.debian.org/src/qt6-webengine/6.6.1%2Bdfsg-1/debian/patches/compressing_files.patch/

There's two or three patches we can add to re-enable builds on i686, or
we can mark it as unsupported.  I don't have a strong opinion either
way.

It also looks like debian doesn't support very many architectures with
qtwebengine@6

https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=qt6-webengine

They also have limited architectures for qtwebengine@5

https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=qtwebengine-opensource-src

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   רנשלפ םירפא
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* bug#67829: qtwebengine new failure on i686
  2023-12-16 17:34   ` Efraim Flashner
@ 2023-12-19 16:46     ` Maxim Cournoyer
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Maxim Cournoyer @ 2023-12-19 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Efraim Flashner; +Cc: John Kehayias, 67829

Hi Efraim,

Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:

[...]

> Upstream chromium removed support for i686 so that's why it's failing.
>
> https://sources.debian.org/src/qt6-webengine/6.6.1%2Bdfsg-1/debian/patches/support-i386.patch/
> https://sources.debian.org/src/qt6-webengine/6.6.1%2Bdfsg-1/debian/patches/disable_32bit_node_check.patch/
> https://sources.debian.org/src/qt6-webengine/6.6.1%2Bdfsg-1/debian/patches/compressing_files.patch/
>
> There's two or three patches we can add to re-enable builds on i686, or
> we can mark it as unsupported.  I don't have a strong opinion either
> way.

If Debian already did the hard work, the best option seems to use their
patches to enable the build on i686 at least :-).  If it becomes to hard
to maintain and they lag on upstream, we could reconsider just marking
it as unsupported.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-12-19 16:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-12-14 20:33 bug#67829: qtwebengine new failure on i686 Maxim Cournoyer
2023-12-15  6:04 ` John Kehayias via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2023-12-16 17:34   ` Efraim Flashner
2023-12-19 16:46     ` Maxim Cournoyer

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).