From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:700:3204::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id SHfIHSLJgWXxRQEAkFu2QA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 17:47:30 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id aIayGCLJgWWWvwAAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 17:47:30 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=XQE3s9h6; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1703004450; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=AUHfr3sgz1jFWt+Sb5ezNW9sbCUQ3SHzcCnYsLtCdeE=; b=CbFOF7wcJGqTsdGJVjE1ZtcsMfnr3XQRUQ76jzplM5su6W9oPxpgoQ6Fsx3YWes4r0WUUE uurlAKALuboICyzfuk1UYt1EA1aSU6hjL9Erw/inzVkOE4Po9vZiBNDpNv+A6lFgHPNnG1 MpO4XqPFuJuqkK8h6k1RwoSsAPx7sOGxH//kqJ0T1RbIUwGmkKwFNfRqktiKYkuPbnaf3v HnhDwZUmqdu8N3ddM3XtqQq+zhSvlyFfVHXJbqeEcdupI4z+CPaoLQ9sShUzSBSRCew9Tp ND4ILMXtGX5yBscR7JaLF0snnnTXKmqRjrl3A4rBrYzLJs9z/Qa7MWqYX4GK9A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=XQE3s9h6; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1703004450; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=AOtCIfGR8zQ2EGCdWlyE8DKvYUU42vVbNhqWFotoYjKXY7lfTs6NereEUqXTx8Osc4zPeh 4z8er1NbtBtgnKiZ7B24Y5XIN0u+t95nI+qgySi3EaeosXwz7V2h6tWXfZTficEjdm/GT7 XeVxV+nKRejThkzhwl/PxBO5M/d146Fm/LZ6gwImqnx5tvFhiMyjfwLlE762J5Svt2UY1K 24tpfVqh3tZR6Ikla864XgKfRj5Ep5IhEgSAhl/eEpOmHW758pcuu+wVX2ybdViK+FLdXM L3cDH4v9tIUWx/pIo19li2CAR2qE6wljUP8noKYCQc12hR4jtfjf+Slk+R5Lhg== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29B1A38265 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 17:47:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rFdFP-0005TG-Ba; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 11:47:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rFdFE-0005Sm-HC for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 11:47:00 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rFdFD-00029V-Hb for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 11:46:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rFdFG-00041J-5g for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 11:47:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#67829: qtwebengine new failure on i686 Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 16:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 67829 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Efraim Flashner Cc: John Kehayias , 67829@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 67829-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B67829.170300440915433 (code B ref 67829); Tue, 19 Dec 2023 16:47:02 +0000 Received: (at 67829) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2023 16:46:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37158 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rFdF3-00040r-FG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 11:46:49 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-xf2f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2f]:42094) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rFdF1-00040b-2J for 67829@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 11:46:47 -0500 Received: by mail-qv1-xf2f.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-67f1880a849so35030856d6.0 for <67829@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 08:46:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1703004398; x=1703609198; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AUHfr3sgz1jFWt+Sb5ezNW9sbCUQ3SHzcCnYsLtCdeE=; b=XQE3s9h6jbJD35/nul5ymywfgh+mr8korj+bCaDQ8CX8pbA3GYIGGNZTFCkl/duJmj XvBuVZ9JPbt5N9khVl0N+KWarL6SaHxDvW34HqNIRVbM295jEM+JdM+AIX5FjLrjHTWi Z7Ygj+6ipJPCyxsq/QiNXmXTcOKxzv+SruRqMSCZQv/WqNl7cVFuBau3sQXsboioJF3q lINt5OPsP2XfztrTptTfvgRh6LDJevS9ByeHge9cYDwksrXeL7rFyIMAv9DXEcOqEc4J o+MiWObUKTJzkEFsXvYcRWbnzEnNemZQ3Lb0w/YJ/l+W01800IDFtcWDlSLY50ENiu9L qU1Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1703004398; x=1703609198; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=AUHfr3sgz1jFWt+Sb5ezNW9sbCUQ3SHzcCnYsLtCdeE=; b=AYQ4biIGFLgchA9fXe1DGWaZhBLTe+6BA4PjErncFmPVFpn5snwsWwac1VUcsEBDei CGWciCsRUCHfwgDlgTljos4fgFfzt/xlSIVdlUFK+h88bgTw54Yn9Rz2nPQ4XLHGyzWY RgxeEqTsqBek7nvcACFYmZc7sE3Ep5NQ1C7Bu6wT/AjaTR6/PQs+dbEUYEa2H0gx3KbB qzmhSsCcvU8oVKaZSo8PmaSD7wCPFnj8+v9oJyUhMv3z8nm3qKGUm4Ia4ueQciLzQ4SS OOoPjW+dMkOjXueB2nd1H6n0d1QHMJ1b4y8CiiIMrs3x5oULi3QcoNdbal/vq2W6XzYs Nivg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyStomwTkS9VzDoU/NEQ6QniCo1n8mpLIlEO1uIK0nJ/0/xlasC 93fqfWm9lkYxUO7HNwuZSrtVZypEdsg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH3EmebMkBnq4VVbfryw3zZOTc2m1RiByvCF+1ddIaAx++WGBUnXPwakPnMzeG/naSMc04CZA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:5284:b0:67f:2c13:3c81 with SMTP id kj4-20020a056214528400b0067f2c133c81mr1752820qvb.8.1703004398536; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 08:46:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from hurd (dsl-205-233-125-220.b2b2c.ca. [205.233.125.220]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c17-20020a056214071100b0067f5a26d929sm920485qvz.143.2023.12.19.08.46.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 19 Dec 2023 08:46:38 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer In-Reply-To: (Efraim Flashner's message of "Sat, 16 Dec 2023 19:34:37 +0200") References: <8734w48qxe.fsf@gmail.com> <874jgkrogm.fsf@protonmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 11:46:37 -0500 Message-ID: <87edfi5edu.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.36 X-Spam-Score: -3.36 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 29B1A38265 X-TUID: Jp5TojPjswAT Hi Efraim, Efraim Flashner writes: [...] > Upstream chromium removed support for i686 so that's why it's failing. > > https://sources.debian.org/src/qt6-webengine/6.6.1%2Bdfsg-1/debian/patches/support-i386.patch/ > https://sources.debian.org/src/qt6-webengine/6.6.1%2Bdfsg-1/debian/patches/disable_32bit_node_check.patch/ > https://sources.debian.org/src/qt6-webengine/6.6.1%2Bdfsg-1/debian/patches/compressing_files.patch/ > > There's two or three patches we can add to re-enable builds on i686, or > we can mark it as unsupported. I don't have a strong opinion either > way. If Debian already did the hard work, the best option seems to use their patches to enable the build on i686 at least :-). If it becomes to hard to maintain and they lag on upstream, we could reconsider just marking it as unsupported. -- Thanks, Maxim