* release_1-9-12
@ 2010-09-09 5:42 rixed
2010-09-09 9:45 ` release_1-9-12 Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: rixed @ 2010-09-09 5:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guile-user
I tested it on the various hardware around and the only problem I
encountered was that on a busybox/ARM some Makefiles are relying on gnu
touch (using options -r and -t) which was not available under the name
"touch" but gtouch (installed separately from busybox). This could have
been simplier with a $(TOUCH) make variable. Idealy, configure should
have tried to find a suitable touch program but I don't think there is
already a macro for that.
Anyway, congrats for this release. As a user that's very pleasant that
guile seams to progress so fast these days.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: release_1-9-12
2010-09-09 5:42 release_1-9-12 rixed
@ 2010-09-09 9:45 ` Ludovic Courtès
2010-09-10 9:02 ` release_1-9-12 Andy Wingo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2010-09-09 9:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guile-user
Hi!
rixed@happyleptic.org writes:
> I tested it on the various hardware around and the only problem I
> encountered was that on a busybox/ARM some Makefiles are relying on gnu
> touch (using options -r and -t) which was not available under the name
> "touch" but gtouch (installed separately from busybox).
I think the ‘touch -r’ invocations are no longer needed, not sure about
the others. Andy?
> This could have been simplier with a $(TOUCH) make variable. Idealy,
> configure should have tried to find a suitable touch program but I
> don't think there is already a macro for that.
Yes, we could do something like that.
> Anyway, congrats for this release. As a user that's very pleasant that
> guile seams to progress so fast these days.
Thanks for the report & support!
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: release_1-9-12
2010-09-09 9:45 ` release_1-9-12 Ludovic Courtès
@ 2010-09-10 9:02 ` Andy Wingo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andy Wingo @ 2010-09-10 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: guile-user
Greets,
On Thu 09 Sep 2010 11:45, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> rixed@happyleptic.org writes:
>
>> I tested it on the various hardware around and the only problem I
>> encountered was that on a busybox/ARM some Makefiles are relying on gnu
>> touch (using options -r and -t) which was not available under the name
>> "touch" but gtouch (installed separately from busybox).
>
> I think the ‘touch -r’ invocations are no longer needed, not sure about
> the others. Andy?
I have fixed the Makefile to not require `touch', I think. Thanks for
the report & suggestion :)
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-09-10 9:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-09-09 5:42 release_1-9-12 rixed
2010-09-09 9:45 ` release_1-9-12 Ludovic Courtès
2010-09-10 9:02 ` release_1-9-12 Andy Wingo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).