From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: release_1-9-12 Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:02:16 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20100909054202.GB31305@yeeloong> <8739tjl07t.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284126068 11460 80.91.229.12 (10 Sep 2010 13:41:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:41:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 10 15:41:06 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ou3qk-0002kD-Cv for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:41:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38066 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ou3qj-0003wW-Fu for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:41:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45066 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ou3qY-0003uD-2D for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:40:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ou3qU-0005k1-2D for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:40:53 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:47248 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ou3qT-0005jx-TO; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:40:50 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B64B0D46E0; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:40:49 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=/X59/b1P9ALU VQpFdjJX/VfhBdo=; b=smS+BLyCpj6RErC/yvvipp//NAVXhB620I28Q/nicm5Y /EGW9s52o7beDUIA8jqCOm3w3IfS0y8yUw0FNe/jcXV2zxE8IvlLs3/AXH5p29D5 H14QmDXwq0DS/rdmJfDmLldWVj2CXK1t/bKIZ5vDpCF1pE1Hv3e2QhaqDZiNVFM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=HqqCu+ AdazR2EB34CDhqO8l0xEhdwcso3cyHQDcaJz/uwbA87hd8S/qP5tkEVi1leKrsVP O96A24A0PDhekSHspMy0n3vh9fheBlvdEDuEZ45mcNmGBx8rzcV1UIFSNbFTyawV xXSSP8zvq8jTBFNQpyF41imjmp+MashFWVgGw= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4472D46DD; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:40:48 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [79.156.144.156]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 105C0D46DA; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:40:46 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <8739tjl07t.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:45:10 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 054475B2-BCE1-11DF-B805-030CEE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:8168 Archived-At: Greets, On Thu 09 Sep 2010 11:45, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > rixed@happyleptic.org writes: > >> I tested it on the various hardware around and the only problem I >> encountered was that on a busybox/ARM some Makefiles are relying on gnu >> touch (using options -r and -t) which was not available under the name >> "touch" but gtouch (installed separately from busybox). > > I think the =E2=80=98touch -r=E2=80=99 invocations are no longer needed, = not sure about > the others. Andy? I have fixed the Makefile to not require `touch', I think. Thanks for the report & suggestion :) Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/