* bug#60487: string-ref segfaults with n < 0 on Guile 3.0.8
@ 2023-01-02 4:12 festerdam
2023-01-02 4:24 ` bug#60488: " festerdam
2023-01-16 22:15 ` bug#60487: " Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: festerdam @ 2023-01-02 4:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 60487
The following code results in a segmentation fault on Guile
3.0.8-deb+3.0.8-2 (obtained from the Debian repositories):
(string-ref "my string" -3)
gdb's backtrace is the following:
#0 0x00007ffff7f1bcc5 in ?? () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#1 0x00007ffff7f26c49 in scm_call_n ()
from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#2 0x00007ffff7e97b29 in scm_apply_0 ()
from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#3 0x00007ffff7f15966 in scm_throw ()
from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#4 0x00007ffff7f174e9 in scm_ithrow ()
from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#5 0x00007ffff7e94735 in scm_error_scm ()
from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#6 0x00007ffff7e94790 in scm_error ()
from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#7 0x00007ffff7ee19e7 in ?? () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#8 0x00007ffff7ee208b in scm_to_uint64 ()
from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#9 0x00007ffff7f1c5e4 in ?? () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#10 0x00007ffff7f26c49 in scm_call_n ()
from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#11 0x00007ffff7e93a97 in scm_primitive_eval ()
from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#12 0x00007ffff7e99a86 in scm_eval ()
from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#13 0x00007ffff7ef91c6 in scm_shell () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#14 0x00007ffff7ea865c in ?? () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#15 0x00007ffff7e91f6a in ?? () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#16 0x00007ffff7f194e8 in ?? () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#17 0x00007ffff7f26c49 in scm_call_n () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#18 0x00007ffff7e936ea in scm_call_2 () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#19 0x00007ffff7f42292 in ?? () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#20 0x00007ffff7f0ff4f in scm_c_catch () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#21 0x00007ffff7e942e6 in scm_c_with_continuation_barrier () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#22 0x00007ffff7f14b89 in ?? () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#23 0x00007ffff7c190e7 in GC_call_with_stack_base () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgc.so.1
#24 0x00007ffff7f0fe68 in scm_with_guile () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#25 0x00007ffff7eb1185 in scm_boot_guile () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#26 0x000055555555510f in ?? ()
#27 0x00007ffff7c9918a in __libc_start_call_main
(main=main@entry=0x5555555550b0, argc=argc@entry=1,
argv=argv@entry=0x7fffffffe0b8) at
../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
#28 0x00007ffff7c99245 in __libc_start_main_impl (main=0x5555555550b0,
argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe0b8, init=<optimized out>, fini=<optimized out>,
rtld_fini=<optimized out>, stack_end=0x7fffffffe0a8) at
../csu/libc-start.c:381
#29 0x00005555555551aa in ?? ()
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* bug#60488: string-ref segfaults with n < 0 on Guile 3.0.8 2023-01-02 4:12 bug#60487: string-ref segfaults with n < 0 on Guile 3.0.8 festerdam @ 2023-01-02 4:24 ` festerdam 2023-01-02 9:01 ` Jean Abou Samra 2023-01-16 22:15 ` bug#60487: " Ludovic Courtès 1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: festerdam @ 2023-01-02 4:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 60488 On 02.01.2023 05:12, festerdam@posteo.net wrote: > The following code results in a segmentation fault on Guile > 3.0.8-deb+3.0.8-2 (obtained from the Debian repositories): > (string-ref "my string" -3) > > gdb's backtrace is the following: > > #0 0x00007ffff7f1bcc5 in ?? () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #1 0x00007ffff7f26c49 in scm_call_n () > from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #2 0x00007ffff7e97b29 in scm_apply_0 () > from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #3 0x00007ffff7f15966 in scm_throw () > from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #4 0x00007ffff7f174e9 in scm_ithrow () > from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #5 0x00007ffff7e94735 in scm_error_scm () > from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #6 0x00007ffff7e94790 in scm_error () > from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #7 0x00007ffff7ee19e7 in ?? () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #8 0x00007ffff7ee208b in scm_to_uint64 () > from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #9 0x00007ffff7f1c5e4 in ?? () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #10 0x00007ffff7f26c49 in scm_call_n () > from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #11 0x00007ffff7e93a97 in scm_primitive_eval () > from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #12 0x00007ffff7e99a86 in scm_eval () > from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #13 0x00007ffff7ef91c6 in scm_shell () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #14 0x00007ffff7ea865c in ?? () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #15 0x00007ffff7e91f6a in ?? () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #16 0x00007ffff7f194e8 in ?? () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #17 0x00007ffff7f26c49 in scm_call_n () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #18 0x00007ffff7e936ea in scm_call_2 () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #19 0x00007ffff7f42292 in ?? () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #20 0x00007ffff7f0ff4f in scm_c_catch () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #21 0x00007ffff7e942e6 in scm_c_with_continuation_barrier () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #22 0x00007ffff7f14b89 in ?? () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #23 0x00007ffff7c190e7 in GC_call_with_stack_base () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgc.so.1 > #24 0x00007ffff7f0fe68 in scm_with_guile () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #25 0x00007ffff7eb1185 in scm_boot_guile () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #26 0x000055555555510f in ?? () > #27 0x00007ffff7c9918a in __libc_start_call_main > (main=main@entry=0x5555555550b0, argc=argc@entry=1, > argv=argv@entry=0x7fffffffe0b8) at > ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58 > #28 0x00007ffff7c99245 in __libc_start_main_impl (main=0x5555555550b0, > argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe0b8, init=<optimized out>, fini=<optimized > out>, rtld_fini=<optimized out>, stack_end=0x7fffffffe0a8) at > ../csu/libc-start.c:381 > #29 0x00005555555551aa in ?? () Sorry, didn't see #59874. This bug report is a duplicate of that bug. Therefore this should be closed. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* bug#60488: string-ref segfaults with n < 0 on Guile 3.0.8 2023-01-02 4:24 ` bug#60488: " festerdam @ 2023-01-02 9:01 ` Jean Abou Samra 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Jean Abou Samra @ 2023-01-02 9:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: festerdam; +Cc: 60488-close > Le 2 janv. 2023 à 09:54, festerdam@posteo.net a écrit : > > On 02.01.2023 05:12, festerdam@posteo.net wrote: >> The following code results in a segmentation fault on Guile >> 3.0.8-deb+3.0.8-2 (obtained from the Debian repositories): >> (string-ref "my string" -3) >> gdb's backtrace is the following: >> #0 0x00007ffff7f1bcc5 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #1 0x00007ffff7f26c49 in scm_call_n () >> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #2 0x00007ffff7e97b29 in scm_apply_0 () >> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #3 0x00007ffff7f15966 in scm_throw () >> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #4 0x00007ffff7f174e9 in scm_ithrow () >> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #5 0x00007ffff7e94735 in scm_error_scm () >> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #6 0x00007ffff7e94790 in scm_error () >> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #7 0x00007ffff7ee19e7 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #8 0x00007ffff7ee208b in scm_to_uint64 () >> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #9 0x00007ffff7f1c5e4 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #10 0x00007ffff7f26c49 in scm_call_n () >> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #11 0x00007ffff7e93a97 in scm_primitive_eval () >> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #12 0x00007ffff7e99a86 in scm_eval () >> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #13 0x00007ffff7ef91c6 in scm_shell () from >> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #14 0x00007ffff7ea865c in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #15 0x00007ffff7e91f6a in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #16 0x00007ffff7f194e8 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #17 0x00007ffff7f26c49 in scm_call_n () from >> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #18 0x00007ffff7e936ea in scm_call_2 () from >> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #19 0x00007ffff7f42292 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #20 0x00007ffff7f0ff4f in scm_c_catch () from >> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #21 0x00007ffff7e942e6 in scm_c_with_continuation_barrier () from >> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #22 0x00007ffff7f14b89 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #23 0x00007ffff7c190e7 in GC_call_with_stack_base () from >> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgc.so.1 >> #24 0x00007ffff7f0fe68 in scm_with_guile () from >> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #25 0x00007ffff7eb1185 in scm_boot_guile () from >> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #26 0x000055555555510f in ?? () >> #27 0x00007ffff7c9918a in __libc_start_call_main >> (main=main@entry=0x5555555550b0, argc=argc@entry=1, >> argv=argv@entry=0x7fffffffe0b8) at >> ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58 >> #28 0x00007ffff7c99245 in __libc_start_main_impl (main=0x5555555550b0, >> argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe0b8, init=<optimized out>, fini=<optimized >> out>, rtld_fini=<optimized out>, stack_end=0x7fffffffe0a8) at >> ../csu/libc-start.c:381 >> #29 0x00005555555551aa in ?? () > > Sorry, didn't see #59874. This bug report is a duplicate of that bug. Therefore this should be closed. > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* bug#60487: string-ref segfaults with n < 0 on Guile 3.0.8 2023-01-02 4:12 bug#60487: string-ref segfaults with n < 0 on Guile 3.0.8 festerdam 2023-01-02 4:24 ` bug#60488: " festerdam @ 2023-01-16 22:15 ` Ludovic Courtès 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2023-01-16 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: festerdam; +Cc: 60487-done Hi, festerdam@posteo.net skribis: > The following code results in a segmentation fault on Guile > 3.0.8-deb+3.0.8-2 (obtained from the Debian repositories): > (string-ref "my string" -3) I can reproduce it with 3.0.8, where I get this backtrace: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- scheme@(guile-user)> (string-ref "my string" -3) Thread 1 "guile" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00007ffff7f419d9 in scm_is_values (x=<optimized out>) at values.h:30 30 values.h: No such file or directory. (gdb) bt #0 0x00007ffff7f419d9 in scm_is_values (x=<optimized out>) at values.h:30 #1 vm_debug_engine (thread=0x7ffff75c1d80) at vm-engine.c:974 #2 0x00007ffff7f4c5d9 in scm_call_n (proc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>, nargs=5) at vm.c:1610 #3 0x00007ffff7eb8571 in scm_apply_0 (proc=#<program 7ffff5c4e960>, args=()) at eval.c:603 #4 0x00007ffff7f3dc8d in scm_throw (key=out-of-range, args=<error reading variable: ERROR: Cannot access memory at address 0x0>0x7ffff2bb2c30) at throw.c:262 #5 0x00007ffff7f3dca9 in scm_ithrow (key=<optimized out>, args=<optimized out>, no_return=<optimized out>) at throw.c:457 #6 0x00007ffff7eb5245 in scm_error_scm (key=key@entry=out-of-range, subr=<optimized out>, message=message@entry="Value out of range ~S to< ~S: ~S", args=args@entry=<error reading variable: ERROR: Cannot access memory at address 0x0>0x7ffff2bb2c70, data=data@entry=(4611686018427387901)) at error.c:90 #7 0x00007ffff7eb52a0 in scm_error (key=out-of-range, subr=0x0, message=<optimized out>, args=<error reading variable: ERROR: Cannot access memory at address 0x0>0x7ffff2bb2c70, rest=(4611686018427387901)) at error.c:62 #8 0x00007ffff7f02dd7 in range_error (bad_val=bad_val@entry=4611686018427387901, min=min@entry=<error reading variable: ERROR: Cannot access memory at address 0x0>0x0, max=#<bignum 7ffff2baeda0>) at numbers.c:6611 #9 0x00007ffff7f04dfb in scm_to_uint64 (arg=4611686018427387901) at integers.c:259 #10 0x00007ffff7f42215 in vm_debug_engine (thread=0x7ffff75c1d80) at vm-engine.c:1533 #11 0x00007ffff7f4c5d9 in scm_call_n (proc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>, nargs=1) at vm.c:1610 #12 0x00007ffff7eb4457 in scm_primitive_eval (exp=<optimized out>, exp@entry=((@ (ice-9 control) %) (begin (load-user-init) ((@ (ice-9 top-repl) top-repl))))) at eval.c:671 #13 0x00007ffff7eba4b6 in scm_eval ( exp=((@ (ice-9 control) %) (begin (load-user-init) ((@ (ice-9 top-repl) top-repl)))), module_or_state="#<struct module>" = {...}) at eval.c:705 #14 0x00007ffff7f1e3b6 in scm_shell (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffd058) at script.c:357 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Fortunately, this was fixed recently in c0004442b7691f59a0e37869ef288eb26382ad9e. Thanks! Ludo’. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-01-16 22:15 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2023-01-02 4:12 bug#60487: string-ref segfaults with n < 0 on Guile 3.0.8 festerdam 2023-01-02 4:24 ` bug#60488: " festerdam 2023-01-02 9:01 ` Jean Abou Samra 2023-01-16 22:15 ` bug#60487: " Ludovic Courtès
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).