* bug#60487: string-ref segfaults with n < 0 on Guile 3.0.8
@ 2023-01-02 4:12 festerdam
2023-01-02 4:24 ` bug#60488: " festerdam
2023-01-16 22:15 ` bug#60487: " Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: festerdam @ 2023-01-02 4:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 60487
The following code results in a segmentation fault on Guile
3.0.8-deb+3.0.8-2 (obtained from the Debian repositories):
(string-ref "my string" -3)
gdb's backtrace is the following:
#0 0x00007ffff7f1bcc5 in ?? () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#1 0x00007ffff7f26c49 in scm_call_n ()
from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#2 0x00007ffff7e97b29 in scm_apply_0 ()
from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#3 0x00007ffff7f15966 in scm_throw ()
from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#4 0x00007ffff7f174e9 in scm_ithrow ()
from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#5 0x00007ffff7e94735 in scm_error_scm ()
from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#6 0x00007ffff7e94790 in scm_error ()
from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#7 0x00007ffff7ee19e7 in ?? () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#8 0x00007ffff7ee208b in scm_to_uint64 ()
from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#9 0x00007ffff7f1c5e4 in ?? () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#10 0x00007ffff7f26c49 in scm_call_n ()
from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#11 0x00007ffff7e93a97 in scm_primitive_eval ()
from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#12 0x00007ffff7e99a86 in scm_eval ()
from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#13 0x00007ffff7ef91c6 in scm_shell () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#14 0x00007ffff7ea865c in ?? () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#15 0x00007ffff7e91f6a in ?? () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#16 0x00007ffff7f194e8 in ?? () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#17 0x00007ffff7f26c49 in scm_call_n () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#18 0x00007ffff7e936ea in scm_call_2 () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#19 0x00007ffff7f42292 in ?? () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#20 0x00007ffff7f0ff4f in scm_c_catch () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#21 0x00007ffff7e942e6 in scm_c_with_continuation_barrier () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#22 0x00007ffff7f14b89 in ?? () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#23 0x00007ffff7c190e7 in GC_call_with_stack_base () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgc.so.1
#24 0x00007ffff7f0fe68 in scm_with_guile () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#25 0x00007ffff7eb1185 in scm_boot_guile () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
#26 0x000055555555510f in ?? ()
#27 0x00007ffff7c9918a in __libc_start_call_main
(main=main@entry=0x5555555550b0, argc=argc@entry=1,
argv=argv@entry=0x7fffffffe0b8) at
../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
#28 0x00007ffff7c99245 in __libc_start_main_impl (main=0x5555555550b0,
argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe0b8, init=<optimized out>, fini=<optimized out>,
rtld_fini=<optimized out>, stack_end=0x7fffffffe0a8) at
../csu/libc-start.c:381
#29 0x00005555555551aa in ?? ()
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* bug#60488: string-ref segfaults with n < 0 on Guile 3.0.8
2023-01-02 4:12 bug#60487: string-ref segfaults with n < 0 on Guile 3.0.8 festerdam
@ 2023-01-02 4:24 ` festerdam
2023-01-02 9:01 ` Jean Abou Samra
2023-01-16 22:15 ` bug#60487: " Ludovic Courtès
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: festerdam @ 2023-01-02 4:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 60488
On 02.01.2023 05:12, festerdam@posteo.net wrote:
> The following code results in a segmentation fault on Guile
> 3.0.8-deb+3.0.8-2 (obtained from the Debian repositories):
> (string-ref "my string" -3)
>
> gdb's backtrace is the following:
>
> #0 0x00007ffff7f1bcc5 in ?? () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #1 0x00007ffff7f26c49 in scm_call_n ()
> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #2 0x00007ffff7e97b29 in scm_apply_0 ()
> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #3 0x00007ffff7f15966 in scm_throw ()
> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #4 0x00007ffff7f174e9 in scm_ithrow ()
> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #5 0x00007ffff7e94735 in scm_error_scm ()
> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #6 0x00007ffff7e94790 in scm_error ()
> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #7 0x00007ffff7ee19e7 in ?? () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #8 0x00007ffff7ee208b in scm_to_uint64 ()
> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #9 0x00007ffff7f1c5e4 in ?? () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #10 0x00007ffff7f26c49 in scm_call_n ()
> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #11 0x00007ffff7e93a97 in scm_primitive_eval ()
> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #12 0x00007ffff7e99a86 in scm_eval ()
> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #13 0x00007ffff7ef91c6 in scm_shell () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #14 0x00007ffff7ea865c in ?? () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #15 0x00007ffff7e91f6a in ?? () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #16 0x00007ffff7f194e8 in ?? () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #17 0x00007ffff7f26c49 in scm_call_n () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #18 0x00007ffff7e936ea in scm_call_2 () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #19 0x00007ffff7f42292 in ?? () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #20 0x00007ffff7f0ff4f in scm_c_catch () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #21 0x00007ffff7e942e6 in scm_c_with_continuation_barrier () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #22 0x00007ffff7f14b89 in ?? () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #23 0x00007ffff7c190e7 in GC_call_with_stack_base () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgc.so.1
> #24 0x00007ffff7f0fe68 in scm_with_guile () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #25 0x00007ffff7eb1185 in scm_boot_guile () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #26 0x000055555555510f in ?? ()
> #27 0x00007ffff7c9918a in __libc_start_call_main
> (main=main@entry=0x5555555550b0, argc=argc@entry=1,
> argv=argv@entry=0x7fffffffe0b8) at
> ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
> #28 0x00007ffff7c99245 in __libc_start_main_impl (main=0x5555555550b0,
> argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe0b8, init=<optimized out>, fini=<optimized
> out>, rtld_fini=<optimized out>, stack_end=0x7fffffffe0a8) at
> ../csu/libc-start.c:381
> #29 0x00005555555551aa in ?? ()
Sorry, didn't see #59874. This bug report is a duplicate of that bug.
Therefore this should be closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* bug#60488: string-ref segfaults with n < 0 on Guile 3.0.8
2023-01-02 4:24 ` bug#60488: " festerdam
@ 2023-01-02 9:01 ` Jean Abou Samra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jean Abou Samra @ 2023-01-02 9:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: festerdam; +Cc: 60488-close
> Le 2 janv. 2023 à 09:54, festerdam@posteo.net a écrit :
>
> On 02.01.2023 05:12, festerdam@posteo.net wrote:
>> The following code results in a segmentation fault on Guile
>> 3.0.8-deb+3.0.8-2 (obtained from the Debian repositories):
>> (string-ref "my string" -3)
>> gdb's backtrace is the following:
>> #0 0x00007ffff7f1bcc5 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #1 0x00007ffff7f26c49 in scm_call_n ()
>> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #2 0x00007ffff7e97b29 in scm_apply_0 ()
>> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #3 0x00007ffff7f15966 in scm_throw ()
>> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #4 0x00007ffff7f174e9 in scm_ithrow ()
>> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #5 0x00007ffff7e94735 in scm_error_scm ()
>> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #6 0x00007ffff7e94790 in scm_error ()
>> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #7 0x00007ffff7ee19e7 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #8 0x00007ffff7ee208b in scm_to_uint64 ()
>> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #9 0x00007ffff7f1c5e4 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #10 0x00007ffff7f26c49 in scm_call_n ()
>> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #11 0x00007ffff7e93a97 in scm_primitive_eval ()
>> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #12 0x00007ffff7e99a86 in scm_eval ()
>> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #13 0x00007ffff7ef91c6 in scm_shell () from
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #14 0x00007ffff7ea865c in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #15 0x00007ffff7e91f6a in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #16 0x00007ffff7f194e8 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #17 0x00007ffff7f26c49 in scm_call_n () from
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #18 0x00007ffff7e936ea in scm_call_2 () from
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #19 0x00007ffff7f42292 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #20 0x00007ffff7f0ff4f in scm_c_catch () from
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #21 0x00007ffff7e942e6 in scm_c_with_continuation_barrier () from
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #22 0x00007ffff7f14b89 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #23 0x00007ffff7c190e7 in GC_call_with_stack_base () from
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgc.so.1
>> #24 0x00007ffff7f0fe68 in scm_with_guile () from
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #25 0x00007ffff7eb1185 in scm_boot_guile () from
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #26 0x000055555555510f in ?? ()
>> #27 0x00007ffff7c9918a in __libc_start_call_main
>> (main=main@entry=0x5555555550b0, argc=argc@entry=1,
>> argv=argv@entry=0x7fffffffe0b8) at
>> ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
>> #28 0x00007ffff7c99245 in __libc_start_main_impl (main=0x5555555550b0,
>> argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe0b8, init=<optimized out>, fini=<optimized
>> out>, rtld_fini=<optimized out>, stack_end=0x7fffffffe0a8) at
>> ../csu/libc-start.c:381
>> #29 0x00005555555551aa in ?? ()
>
> Sorry, didn't see #59874. This bug report is a duplicate of that bug. Therefore this should be closed.
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* bug#60487: string-ref segfaults with n < 0 on Guile 3.0.8
2023-01-02 4:12 bug#60487: string-ref segfaults with n < 0 on Guile 3.0.8 festerdam
2023-01-02 4:24 ` bug#60488: " festerdam
@ 2023-01-16 22:15 ` Ludovic Courtès
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2023-01-16 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: festerdam; +Cc: 60487-done
Hi,
festerdam@posteo.net skribis:
> The following code results in a segmentation fault on Guile
> 3.0.8-deb+3.0.8-2 (obtained from the Debian repositories):
> (string-ref "my string" -3)
I can reproduce it with 3.0.8, where I get this backtrace:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
scheme@(guile-user)> (string-ref "my string" -3)
Thread 1 "guile" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00007ffff7f419d9 in scm_is_values (x=<optimized out>) at values.h:30
30 values.h: No such file or directory.
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007ffff7f419d9 in scm_is_values (x=<optimized out>) at values.h:30
#1 vm_debug_engine (thread=0x7ffff75c1d80) at vm-engine.c:974
#2 0x00007ffff7f4c5d9 in scm_call_n (proc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>, nargs=5)
at vm.c:1610
#3 0x00007ffff7eb8571 in scm_apply_0 (proc=#<program 7ffff5c4e960>, args=()) at eval.c:603
#4 0x00007ffff7f3dc8d in scm_throw (key=out-of-range,
args=<error reading variable: ERROR: Cannot access memory at address 0x0>0x7ffff2bb2c30)
at throw.c:262
#5 0x00007ffff7f3dca9 in scm_ithrow (key=<optimized out>, args=<optimized out>,
no_return=<optimized out>) at throw.c:457
#6 0x00007ffff7eb5245 in scm_error_scm (key=key@entry=out-of-range, subr=<optimized out>,
message=message@entry="Value out of range ~S to< ~S: ~S",
args=args@entry=<error reading variable: ERROR: Cannot access memory at address 0x0>0x7ffff2bb2c70, data=data@entry=(4611686018427387901)) at error.c:90
#7 0x00007ffff7eb52a0 in scm_error (key=out-of-range, subr=0x0, message=<optimized out>,
args=<error reading variable: ERROR: Cannot access memory at address 0x0>0x7ffff2bb2c70,
rest=(4611686018427387901)) at error.c:62
#8 0x00007ffff7f02dd7 in range_error (bad_val=bad_val@entry=4611686018427387901,
min=min@entry=<error reading variable: ERROR: Cannot access memory at address 0x0>0x0,
max=#<bignum 7ffff2baeda0>) at numbers.c:6611
#9 0x00007ffff7f04dfb in scm_to_uint64 (arg=4611686018427387901) at integers.c:259
#10 0x00007ffff7f42215 in vm_debug_engine (thread=0x7ffff75c1d80) at vm-engine.c:1533
#11 0x00007ffff7f4c5d9 in scm_call_n (proc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>, nargs=1)
at vm.c:1610
#12 0x00007ffff7eb4457 in scm_primitive_eval (exp=<optimized out>,
exp@entry=((@ (ice-9 control) %) (begin (load-user-init) ((@ (ice-9 top-repl) top-repl)))))
at eval.c:671
#13 0x00007ffff7eba4b6 in scm_eval (
exp=((@ (ice-9 control) %) (begin (load-user-init) ((@ (ice-9 top-repl) top-repl)))),
module_or_state="#<struct module>" = {...}) at eval.c:705
#14 0x00007ffff7f1e3b6 in scm_shell (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffd058) at script.c:357
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Fortunately, this was fixed recently in
c0004442b7691f59a0e37869ef288eb26382ad9e.
Thanks!
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-01-16 22:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-01-02 4:12 bug#60487: string-ref segfaults with n < 0 on Guile 3.0.8 festerdam
2023-01-02 4:24 ` bug#60488: " festerdam
2023-01-02 9:01 ` Jean Abou Samra
2023-01-16 22:15 ` bug#60487: " Ludovic Courtès
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).