unofficial mirror of bug-guile@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* bug#14917: Missing range check in fxcopy-bit can give SIGABRT
@ 2013-07-20  6:57 Göran Weinholt
  2016-06-21  7:35 ` Andy Wingo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Göran Weinholt @ 2013-07-20  6:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 14917

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1139 bytes --]

Hello schemers,

the fxcopy-bit procedure from (rnrs) is missing some range checks. It
can return a non-fixnum:

scheme@(guile-user)> (import (rnrs))
scheme@(guile-user)> (fxcopy-bit 0 (fixnum-width) 1)
$1 = 9223372036854775808

It can also crash the guile process, which is somewhat surprising for a
fixnum procedure:

scheme@(guile-user)> (import (rnrs))
scheme@(guile-user)> (fxcopy-bit 0 100000000000 0)
FATAL: memory error in realloc
Aborted

Here's an alternative error message:

scheme@(guile-user)> (import (rnrs))
scheme@(guile-user)> (fxcopy-bit 0 1000000000000 0)
gmp: overflow in mpz type
Aborted

Other implementations of fxcopy-bit usually check that the third
argument is 0 or 1, but I'm not sure that is required.

There's also a bitwise-copy-bit procedure that is similary affected.
Tested with Guile 2.0.9.40-824b-dirty on an amd64 system.

Regards,

-- 
Göran Weinholt <goran@weinholt.se>
"Mr. Crane, please remember you're not required to answer any of
Lt. Tragg's questions. As a matter of fact, don't even discuss the
weather with him, he can be very persuasive." -- Perry Mason

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 835 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* bug#14917: Missing range check in fxcopy-bit can give SIGABRT
  2013-07-20  6:57 bug#14917: Missing range check in fxcopy-bit can give SIGABRT Göran Weinholt
@ 2016-06-21  7:35 ` Andy Wingo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andy Wingo @ 2016-06-21  7:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Göran Weinholt; +Cc: 14917-done

Howdy :)

Three years later, this is now fixed and will be in 2.1.4.  I think
we'll cherry-pick it back to 2.0.12 too.

Cheers,

Andy

On Sat 20 Jul 2013 08:57, Göran Weinholt <goran@weinholt.se> writes:

> Hello schemers,
>
> the fxcopy-bit procedure from (rnrs) is missing some range checks. It
> can return a non-fixnum:
>
> scheme@(guile-user)> (import (rnrs))
> scheme@(guile-user)> (fxcopy-bit 0 (fixnum-width) 1)
> $1 = 9223372036854775808
>
> It can also crash the guile process, which is somewhat surprising for a
> fixnum procedure:
>
> scheme@(guile-user)> (import (rnrs))
> scheme@(guile-user)> (fxcopy-bit 0 100000000000 0)
> FATAL: memory error in realloc
> Aborted
>
> Here's an alternative error message:
>
> scheme@(guile-user)> (import (rnrs))
> scheme@(guile-user)> (fxcopy-bit 0 1000000000000 0)
> gmp: overflow in mpz type
> Aborted
>
> Other implementations of fxcopy-bit usually check that the third
> argument is 0 or 1, but I'm not sure that is required.
>
> There's also a bitwise-copy-bit procedure that is similary affected.
> Tested with Guile 2.0.9.40-824b-dirty on an amd64 system.
>
> Regards,





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-06-21  7:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-07-20  6:57 bug#14917: Missing range check in fxcopy-bit can give SIGABRT Göran Weinholt
2016-06-21  7:35 ` Andy Wingo

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).