unofficial mirror of bug-guile@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
To: Daniel Hartwig <mandyke@gmail.com>
Cc: 13741@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#13741: [PATCH] test-suite: eq-ness of numbers, characters is unspecified
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:19:12 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bobgop7z.fsf@tines.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1361238914-14823-1-git-send-email-mandyke@gmail.com> (Daniel Hartwig's message of "Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:55:14 +0800")

Daniel Hartwig <mandyke@gmail.com> writes:
> * test-suite/tests/00-socket.test:
> * test-suite/tests/alist.test:
> * test-suite/tests/elisp.test:
> * test-suite/tests/encoding-iso88591.test:
> * test-suite/tests/encoding-iso88597.test:
> * test-suite/tests/encoding-utf8.test:
> * test-suite/tests/hash.test:
> * test-suite/tests/i18n.test:
> * test-suite/tests/modules.test:
> * test-suite/tests/ports.test:
> * test-suite/tests/srfi-35.test: Make tests use eqv? instead of eq? when
>   comparing numbers, characters.  Checked also for similar uses of
>   assq[-ref].
>
> * test-suite/tests/vlist.test ("vhash-delete honors HASH"): Change test
>   to use eqv-ness, not eq-ness, which should not impact its purpose as
>   these two are equivalent for strings.

I think we should apply this patch.  Although we can currently rely on
'eq?' working properly for fixnums and characters in Guile, misuse of
'eq?' is widespread, and our misuse of it in our own code contributes to
the confusion.  IMO we should set a better example.

What do other people think?

      Mark





  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-19  5:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-18  3:27 bug#13741: guile-2.0: optimize, and eq-ness of literals (test-suite) Daniel Hartwig
2013-02-18  9:16 ` Ludovic Courtès
2013-02-18 10:02   ` Daniel Hartwig
2013-03-01 16:13     ` Mark H Weaver
2013-02-18 17:19   ` Andy Wingo
2013-02-18 23:48   ` Mark H Weaver
2013-02-19  1:55     ` bug#13741: [PATCH] test-suite: eq-ness of numbers, characters is unspecified Daniel Hartwig
2013-02-19  4:29       ` Daniel Hartwig
2013-02-19  5:19       ` Mark H Weaver [this message]
2013-03-01 16:10         ` Mark H Weaver

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87bobgop7z.fsf@tines.lan \
    --to=mhw@netris.org \
    --cc=13741@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=mandyke@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).