bug#19793: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

bug#19793: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

[Andy Wingo]

Reporter unavailable, closing bug.

On Tue 28 Jun 2016 11:31, MAILER-DAEMON@pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Mail Delivery System) writes:

> This is the mail system at host pb-sasl1.pobox.com.
>
> I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
> be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
>
> For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
>
> If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
> delete your own text from the attached returned message.
>
>                    The mail system
>
> <andrew@cachedot.net>: Host or domain name not found. Name service error for
>     name=cachedot.net type=MX: Host not found, try again
>
> Reporting-MTA: dns; pb-sasl1.pobox.com
> X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 9B24A20804
> X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; wingo@pobox.com
> Arrival-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 05:14:45 -0400 (EDT)
>
> Final-Recipient: rfc822; andrew@cachedot.net
> Original-Recipient: rfc822;andrew@cachedot.net
> Action: failed
> Status: 4.4.3
> Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; Host or domain name not found. Name service error
>     for name=cachedot.net type=MX: Host not found, try again
>
> From: Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>
> Subject: Re: bug#19793: please document level of R7RS[-small] support in Guile manual
> To: "andrew@cachedot.net" <andrew@cachedot.net>
> Cc: 19793@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:14:38 +0200 (5 days, 7 hours, 5 minutes ago)
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Would you be willing to create such a document?  Contributions would be
> happily accepted :)  Take a look at doc/ref/r6rs.texi for a template
> (just the incompatibilities and general overview section I guess).
>
> Andy
>
> On Fri 06 Feb 2015 09:56, "andrew@cachedot.net" <andrew@cachedot.net> writes:
>
>> It would be nice if the Guile manual described to what extent Guile
>> supports R7RS[-small],
>>
>> and what R7RS features are still missing.
>>
>> Something along the lines of
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2012-02/msg00065.html
>>
>> but up to date.
>>
>> thanks
> ----------