From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#19793: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:21:24 +0200 Message-ID: <877fd98et7.fsf@pobox.com> References: <20160628093142.846D823B5D@pb-sasl1.pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1467130953 12926 80.91.229.3 (28 Jun 2016 16:22:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:22:33 +0000 (UTC) To: 19793-done@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 28 18:22:22 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bHvmG-0001S5-Dr for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:22:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38023 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHvmF-0006JR-Fy for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:22:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35503) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHvm3-0006HS-BK for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:22:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHvly-0006Eo-2p for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:22:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46930) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHvlx-0006Ej-Uj for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:22:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bHvlx-0001vU-Qv for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:22:01 -0400 Resent-From: Andy Wingo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:22:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 19793 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 19793@debbugs.gnu.org, wingo@pobox.com, andrew@cachedot.net Original-Received: via spool by 19793-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D19793.14671308967366 (code D ref 19793); Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:22:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19793-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jun 2016 16:21:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59267 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bHvlY-0001uk-4g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:21:36 -0400 Original-Received: from pb-sasl1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.66]:51686 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bHvlW-0001uZ-B5 for 19793-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:21:34 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB85526B8F for <19793-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:21:33 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=/5o1EeVhCZnfmGQXNyL92EstSyk=; b=KGiqI6 tvHjHq5+hjVAcMCN21MayDTFiN8IM/ysAqe1EYTaC0/A4jsDod7FqtWJ6qc7plr2 3EIhUlJB4JiIB2ysugClR3/RvaWEoNMAtnOOKSH1vmXFK9c1Y8hm7hkbFUdT1uQZ pijT1yd3cxvrooGEEK/IDSGeNXNybyW2Zd/2Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:subject :references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=LIvrRcAWev5GTQ3gvM6bkweqX8MhnRmF TS1APISd29/11025v9n5u6VMhm00UzoPfM5M5fsOQakEbpPxj/BijNI+IqQ8ytC1 r2Zhkc+5M678CFxha38GErQ/Q54ALs8oYjhv9T+3sOyP8peLOZa4NGHj+4ihfxDs VMbqyOqP+C4= Original-Received: from pb-sasl1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B438E26B8E for <19793-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:21:33 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from clucks (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 037CC26B8D for <19793-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:21:32 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20160628093142.846D823B5D@pb-sasl1.pobox.com> (Mail Delivery System's message of "Tue, 28 Jun 2016 05:31:42 -0400 (EDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 60BFCB16-3D4C-11E6-AD65-C1836462E9F6-02397024!pb-sasl1.pobox.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-guile" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:8268 Archived-At: Reporter unavailable, closing bug. On Tue 28 Jun 2016 11:31, MAILER-DAEMON@pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Mail Delivery System) writes: > This is the mail system at host pb-sasl1.pobox.com. > > I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not > be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. > > For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster. > > If you do so, please include this problem report. You can > delete your own text from the attached returned message. > > The mail system > > : Host or domain name not found. Name service error for > name=cachedot.net type=MX: Host not found, try again > > Reporting-MTA: dns; pb-sasl1.pobox.com > X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 9B24A20804 > X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; wingo@pobox.com > Arrival-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 05:14:45 -0400 (EDT) > > Final-Recipient: rfc822; andrew@cachedot.net > Original-Recipient: rfc822;andrew@cachedot.net > Action: failed > Status: 4.4.3 > Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; Host or domain name not found. Name service error > for name=cachedot.net type=MX: Host not found, try again > > From: Andy Wingo > Subject: Re: bug#19793: please document level of R7RS[-small] support in Guile manual > To: "andrew@cachedot.net" > Cc: 19793@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:14:38 +0200 (5 days, 7 hours, 5 minutes ago) > > Hi Andrew, > > Would you be willing to create such a document? Contributions would be > happily accepted :) Take a look at doc/ref/r6rs.texi for a template > (just the incompatibilities and general overview section I guess). > > Andy > > On Fri 06 Feb 2015 09:56, "andrew@cachedot.net" writes: > >> It would be nice if the Guile manual described to what extent Guile >> supports R7RS[-small], >> >> and what R7RS features are still missing. >> >> Something along the lines of >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2012-02/msg00065.html >> >> but up to date. >> >> thanks > ----------