* stack-trace-on-error
@ 2011-01-21 17:04 Stefan Monnier
2011-01-22 0:51 ` stack-trace-on-error Glenn Morris
2011-01-26 19:29 ` stack-trace-on-error Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2011-01-21 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-devel
Any objection to removing stack-trace-on-error (it can't introduce
incompatibility problems) or at least marking it obsolete?
Stefan "who just discovered it"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: stack-trace-on-error
2011-01-21 17:04 stack-trace-on-error Stefan Monnier
@ 2011-01-22 0:51 ` Glenn Morris
2011-01-26 19:29 ` stack-trace-on-error Tom Tromey
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Glenn Morris @ 2011-01-22 0:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: emacs-devel
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Any objection to removing stack-trace-on-error (it can't introduce
> incompatibility problems) or at least marking it obsolete?
No opinion, but it is apparently not entirely the same as debug-on-error:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2005-03/msg00208.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: stack-trace-on-error
2011-01-21 17:04 stack-trace-on-error Stefan Monnier
2011-01-22 0:51 ` stack-trace-on-error Glenn Morris
@ 2011-01-26 19:29 ` Tom Tromey
2011-01-27 3:54 ` stack-trace-on-error Stefan Monnier
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2011-01-26 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: emacs-devel
Stefan> Any objection to removing stack-trace-on-error (it can't introduce
Stefan> incompatibility problems) or at least marking it obsolete?
I have found it handy when debugging `emacs --script'.
Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: stack-trace-on-error
2011-01-26 19:29 ` stack-trace-on-error Tom Tromey
@ 2011-01-27 3:54 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-01-27 14:59 ` stack-trace-on-error Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2011-01-27 3:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Tromey; +Cc: emacs-devel
Stefan> Any objection to removing stack-trace-on-error (it can't introduce
Stefan> incompatibility problems) or at least marking it obsolete?
> I have found it handy when debugging `emacs --script'.
Doesn't debug-on-error do the same in such a context?
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: stack-trace-on-error
2011-01-27 3:54 ` stack-trace-on-error Stefan Monnier
@ 2011-01-27 14:59 ` Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2011-01-27 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: emacs-devel
Stefan> Any objection to removing stack-trace-on-error (it can't introduce
Stefan> incompatibility problems) or at least marking it obsolete?
Tom> I have found it handy when debugging `emacs --script'.
Stefan> Doesn't debug-on-error do the same in such a context?
I don't know, since I've always used stack-trace-on-error.
But if so, then that is good enough for me.
Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-27 14:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-01-21 17:04 stack-trace-on-error Stefan Monnier
2011-01-22 0:51 ` stack-trace-on-error Glenn Morris
2011-01-26 19:29 ` stack-trace-on-error Tom Tromey
2011-01-27 3:54 ` stack-trace-on-error Stefan Monnier
2011-01-27 14:59 ` stack-trace-on-error Tom Tromey
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.