From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Tromey Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: stack-trace-on-error Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 07:59:11 -0700 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296140367 23284 80.91.229.12 (27 Jan 2011 14:59:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 14:59:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 27 15:59:23 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PiTJj-0003tC-Al for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:59:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53775 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PiTJi-00048Z-Tb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:59:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45683 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PiTJb-00048F-Fy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:59:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PiTJa-0004ak-Er for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:59:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:64579) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PiTJa-0004aV-3T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:59:14 -0500 Original-Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p0RExCdd000650 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:59:12 -0500 Original-Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p0RExCIi007722; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:59:12 -0500 Original-Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p0RExBP8005515; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:59:11 -0500 Original-Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 262C737887A; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 07:59:11 -0700 (MST) X-Attribution: Tom In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:54:12 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.22 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:135105 Archived-At: Stefan> Any objection to removing stack-trace-on-error (it can't introduce Stefan> incompatibility problems) or at least marking it obsolete? Tom> I have found it handy when debugging `emacs --script'. Stefan> Doesn't debug-on-error do the same in such a context? I don't know, since I've always used stack-trace-on-error. But if so, then that is good enough for me. Tom