Re: Progress on merging Eglot?

[Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>]

Payas Relekar <relekarpayas@gmail.com> writes:

> Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:
>
>> João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:
>>>
>>>> In either case, the main problem is that the (908) commits in the
>>>> repository don't appear to be in the conventional changelog format,
>>>> and I don't think there is an easy way to automatically fix that.
>>>
>>> Can you point to examples?  And why do you say it's a "main problem"?
>>
>> I should have been more concrete, a lot of messages appear to reference
>> issues in the elgot issue tracker, that wouldn't make much sense in
>> emacs.git.
>
> If we choose to recreate commit history one time, can we simply replace
> the #num with Github issue link? Should be relatively simple regex find
> and replace.

Since many of the #nums are in the first commit line, this could cause
too long commit messages.

> Thanks,
> Payas
>
> --