all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
To: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Why shouldn't we have a #if .... #else .... #endif construct in Emacs Lisp?
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 12:54:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877cpeko06.fsf@posteo.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZOz3lR_4Al88SEJ_@ACM> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Mon, 28 Aug 2023 19:37:57 +0000")

Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> writes:

> Hello, Emacs.
>
> In C, we have the very useful conditional compilation directives
> introduced by #if or #ifdef, etc., which end at #end.
>
> In Emacs Lisp we have no such construct.  This is a Bad Thing.
>
> More and more, especially recently, irritating warning messages are
> occurring for, for example, obsolete variables and functions inside
> conditionals which ensure they aren't used.  For example:
>
>     (when (< emacs-major-version 24)
>       (defadvice .....))
>
> produces the warning about defadvice being obsolete.  (I haven't actually
> tested this example).  What we really want here is for the defadvice only
> to be _compiled_ when (< emacs-major-version 24), rather than compiled
> unconditionally and not run.

In this specific case, would it be possible to use the nadvice
compatibility package on GNU ELPA?

> I propose a new function, hash-if, which would do what we want.  The
> above example could then be written something like:
>
>     (hash-if (< emacs-major-version 24)
>         (defadvice .....)
>       (advice-add .....))
>
> ..  This is not actually all that difficult to write.  My first attempt
> uses a compiler-macro, and looks like this:
>
>     (defun hash-if (condition if-part &rest else-part)
>       "A compiler macro analogous to C's #if.
>     CONDITION is evaluated at compile time.  If it is non-nil,
>     IF-PART gets compiled.  Otherwise ELSE-PART (enclosed in a
>     `progn') gets compiled."
>       (declare (indent 2))
>       (error "hash-if has been called directly"))
>
>     (put 'hash-if 'compiler-macro
>          (lambda (form condition if-part &rest else-part)
>            (if (eval condition lexical-binding)
>                if-part
>              (cons 'progn else-part))))

Would something like work as well:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(defmacro cif (test then &rest else)
  "Evaluate TEST during macro-expansion and return THEN or ELSE."
  (if (eval test t) then else))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

> ..  I propose adding it to subr.el, just before (defmacro when ....).
>
> What do people think about this?



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-29 12:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-28 19:37 Why shouldn't we have a #if .... #else .... #endif construct in Emacs Lisp? Alan Mackenzie
2023-08-28 19:47 ` Ulrich Mueller
2023-08-28 20:06   ` Alan Mackenzie
2023-08-28 21:01     ` Ulrich Mueller
2023-08-28 21:46       ` Alan Mackenzie
2023-08-31  2:07         ` Richard Stallman
2023-08-31  7:50           ` Alan Mackenzie
2023-09-04  1:34             ` Richard Stallman
2023-09-04 10:50               ` Alan Mackenzie
2023-09-04 11:02                 ` tomas
2023-09-04 15:19                   ` Emanuel Berg
2023-09-04 18:57                     ` tomas
2023-09-06  0:58                   ` Richard Stallman
2023-09-06  0:58                 ` Richard Stallman
2023-09-06  7:28                   ` Andreas Schwab
2023-09-06  9:31                     ` Alan Mackenzie
2023-09-06  9:56                   ` Alan Mackenzie
2023-09-09  0:39                     ` Richard Stallman
2023-09-09 10:32                       ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-10  0:22                         ` Richard Stallman
2023-09-10  8:36                           ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-13 23:53                             ` Richard Stallman
2023-09-20 12:59                               ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-05  0:30           ` Why have a #if .... #else .... #endif construct in Emacs Lisp, when we could make the existing code DTRT unchanged? Richard Stallman
2023-09-05  0:41             ` Emanuel Berg
2023-09-08 17:54               ` Emanuel Berg
2023-09-05  4:37             ` tomas
2023-09-05  5:53               ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-05  6:28                 ` tomas
2023-09-05 11:06             ` Adam Porter
2023-09-05 11:26             ` Lynn Winebarger
2023-09-05 14:11             ` Alan Mackenzie
2023-09-08  1:01               ` Richard Stallman
2023-09-08  2:45                 ` Po Lu
2023-09-10  0:24                   ` Richard Stallman
2023-09-05  8:14         ` Why shouldn't we have a #if .... #else .... #endif construct in Emacs Lisp? Ulrich Mueller
2023-08-28 19:53 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-08-29  9:19   ` Alan Mackenzie
2023-08-29 10:36   ` João Távora
2023-08-29 11:09     ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-08-29 11:20       ` João Távora
2023-08-30 20:48         ` Sean Whitton
2023-08-30 20:59           ` João Távora
2023-09-02 23:12     ` Stefan Monnier via Emacs development discussions.
2023-09-03  0:18       ` Emanuel Berg
2023-09-03 12:27       ` João Távora
2023-08-29 12:54 ` Philip Kaludercic [this message]
2023-08-29 13:23   ` Alan Mackenzie
2023-09-02 23:09   ` Stefan Monnier via Emacs development discussions.
2023-08-29 16:28 ` LdBeth
2023-08-29 20:09 ` Stefan Kangas
2023-08-30 10:31   ` Alan Mackenzie
2023-08-30 17:36     ` Stefan Kangas
2023-08-30 18:03       ` Alan Mackenzie
2023-08-30 18:17         ` Stefan Kangas
2023-09-02 15:06           ` Alan Mackenzie
2023-09-02 15:17             ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-09-02 19:43               ` Alan Mackenzie
2023-09-03  4:42                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-09-03 10:48                   ` Alan Mackenzie
2023-09-03 11:02                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-09-03 13:24                       ` Alan Mackenzie
2023-09-02 19:20             ` Philip Kaludercic
2023-09-02 19:37               ` Stefan Kangas
2023-09-02 19:58               ` Alan Mackenzie
2023-09-04 11:12                 ` Lynn Winebarger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877cpeko06.fsf@posteo.net \
    --to=philipk@posteo.net \
    --cc=acm@muc.de \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.