From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Cc: Juri Linkov <juri@jurta.org>,
emacs-devel@gnu.org, "Kim F. Storm" <storm@cua.dk>
Subject: Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line (To M-g M-g or not to M-g)
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:49:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x5is3zvkqg.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1D9I68-0002f1-IA@cante.cante.net> (Jari Aalto's message of "Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:28:44 +0200")
Jari Aalto <jari.aalto@cante.net> writes:
> | >David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:
> | > no previous desire, not fitting the feature
> | > freeze. Is this a plot to distract people from releasing?
> |
> | IMO, it is a reasonable opportunity to DTRT before locking M-g down as
> | a single command-key only.
>
> Juri made interesting suggestings, and I would see it beneficial if
> future be taken into consideration as well.
>
> M-g prefix sounds good for future additions.
> M-g M-g for goto-line sounds fast enough, because it's same key.
Only if you have a Meta key. But doubling it up with M-g g would make
that a non-issue mostly.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-10 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-09 7:05 Key binding M-g should really be goto-line Juri Linkov
2005-03-09 7:53 ` Miles Bader
2005-03-09 8:32 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-03-10 6:28 ` Juri Linkov
2005-03-09 9:58 ` David Kastrup
2005-03-09 10:47 ` Miles Bader
2005-03-09 13:17 ` David Kastrup
2005-03-09 11:27 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-03-10 9:18 ` Piet van Oostrum
2005-03-10 10:16 ` Miles Bader
2005-03-10 10:47 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-03-10 12:21 ` M-g binding in Gnus (was: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line) Reiner Steib
2005-03-10 12:59 ` M-g binding in Gnus Kim F. Storm
2005-03-10 13:34 ` Reiner Steib
2005-03-10 15:18 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-03-10 2:03 ` Key binding M-g should really be goto-line Richard Stallman
2005-03-10 7:28 ` Key binding M-g should really be goto-line (To M-g M-g or not to M-g) Jari Aalto
2005-03-10 10:49 ` David Kastrup [this message]
2005-03-11 7:07 ` Jari Aalto
2005-03-09 21:51 ` Key binding M-g should really be goto-line Romain Francoise
2005-03-09 22:34 ` David Kastrup
2005-03-10 0:33 ` Miles Bader
2005-03-10 0:54 ` David Kastrup
2005-03-10 1:28 ` Johan Bockgård
2005-03-10 6:29 ` Juri Linkov
2005-03-10 7:24 ` Romain Francoise
2005-03-10 10:48 ` David Kastrup
2005-03-10 11:41 ` Romain Francoise
2005-03-10 13:23 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-03-10 15:19 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-03-18 10:27 ` Romain Francoise
2005-03-18 12:11 ` M-g suffixes. Was: " David Kastrup
2005-03-18 12:59 ` Romain Francoise
2005-03-18 13:17 ` David Kastrup
2005-03-18 13:58 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-03-18 18:59 ` Gaetan Leurent
2005-03-19 3:09 ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-19 9:20 ` David Kastrup
2005-03-20 14:41 ` Romain Francoise
2005-03-21 1:18 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=x5is3zvkqg.fsf@lola.goethe.zz \
--to=dak@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=juri@jurta.org \
--cc=storm@cua.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).