From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line (To M-g M-g or not to M-g) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:49:43 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87y8cx4b3e.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1110454867 24029 80.91.229.2 (10 Mar 2005 11:41:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:41:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , emacs-devel@gnu.org, "Kim F. Storm" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 10 12:41:06 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D9M21-0007fj-Mh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:40:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D9MGs-0003u2-VK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:56:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D9Lff-0002Qz-Bg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:17:41 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D9Lez-0001wW-PT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:17:03 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D9LUA-0000yv-Io for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:05:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D9LEg-0007UM-9S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 05:49:46 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D9LEf-0003C1-8N; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 05:49:45 -0500 Original-To: Jari Aalto In-Reply-To: (Jari Aalto's message of "Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:28:44 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:34412 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:34412 Jari Aalto writes: > | >David Kastrup writes: > | > no previous desire, not fitting the feature > | > freeze. Is this a plot to distract people from releasing? > | > | IMO, it is a reasonable opportunity to DTRT before locking M-g down as > | a single command-key only. > > Juri made interesting suggestings, and I would see it beneficial if > future be taken into consideration as well. > > M-g prefix sounds good for future additions. > M-g M-g for goto-line sounds fast enough, because it's same key. Only if you have a Meta key. But doubling it up with M-g g would make that a non-issue mostly. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum