* Encryption code is ok
@ 2004-05-04 20:07 Richard Stallman
2004-05-04 22:28 ` David Kastrup
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Richard Stallman @ 2004-05-04 20:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
After further discussion with our lawyer I've concluded that it really
is ok to have encryption code in Emacs. So there is no need to
remove that.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: Encryption code is ok
2004-05-04 20:07 Encryption code is ok Richard Stallman
@ 2004-05-04 22:28 ` David Kastrup
2004-05-05 20:21 ` Richard Stallman
2004-05-05 6:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-15 13:18 ` Simon Josefsson
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Kastrup @ 2004-05-04 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: emacs-devel
Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
> After further discussion with our lawyer I've concluded that it really
> is ok to have encryption code in Emacs. So there is no need to
> remove that.
That's a relief. Throwing out anything that could potentially made to
interface to encryption would really prove painful.
Ok, not that the efficiency of Emacs Lisp would make this feasible,
but just for the record: does your question encompass just code
interfacing to cryptographic applications, or even cryptographic code
itself written in Emacs Lisp? The question is purely academic, so
don't exert any time for research if the answer is not clear, anyway.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Encryption code is ok
2004-05-04 20:07 Encryption code is ok Richard Stallman
2004-05-04 22:28 ` David Kastrup
@ 2004-05-05 6:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-05 20:21 ` Richard Stallman
2004-05-15 13:18 ` Simon Josefsson
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2004-05-05 6:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: emacs-devel
> From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
> Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 16:07:36 -0400
>
> After further discussion with our lawyer I've concluded that it really
> is ok to have encryption code in Emacs. So there is no need to
> remove that.
Unless it was already done, perhaps it would be a good idea to have on
the gnu.org Web site some guidelines, based on your discussions with
the lawyers, about using encryption code in the GNU project.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Encryption code is ok
2004-05-04 20:07 Encryption code is ok Richard Stallman
2004-05-04 22:28 ` David Kastrup
2004-05-05 6:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2004-05-15 13:18 ` Simon Josefsson
2004-05-16 13:21 ` Richard Stallman
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Simon Josefsson @ 2004-05-15 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
Richard Stallman <rms <at> gnu.org> writes:
> After further discussion with our lawyer I've concluded that it really
> is ok to have encryption code in Emacs. So there is no need to
> remove that.
Good news. Does this also mean that having crypto code on Savannah is OK? Or
are those separate issues? I removed some of my projects from savannah recently
due to this.
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-05-16 13:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-05-04 20:07 Encryption code is ok Richard Stallman
2004-05-04 22:28 ` David Kastrup
2004-05-05 20:21 ` Richard Stallman
2004-05-05 6:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-05 20:21 ` Richard Stallman
2004-05-15 13:18 ` Simon Josefsson
2004-05-16 13:21 ` Richard Stallman
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).