From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
To: xenodasein--- via "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
Cc: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>,
xenodasein@tutanota.de, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
pappasbrent@knights.ucf.edu
Subject: Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 09:53:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jwvr0y0nwq1.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <NH8O9Fo--3-9@tutanota.de> (xenodasein's message of "Fri, 18 Nov 2022 07:19:45 +0100 (CET)")
> Why do you not consider __attribute__((always_inline)) an improvement
> over macros where applicable?
Can we drop this discussion. AFAIK all those who matter already
explained clearly that we generally agree it's an improvement, but that
it's not enough of an improvement to justify making the change just for
the sake of it.
IOW we all agree on the general idea, we just disagree on the degrees
and I see no way we'll convince each other to agree on what degree
is right. So we just have to tolerate other people's preferences, with
the understanding that none of us is *right*.
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-18 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-14 18:05 Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions Brent Pappas
2022-11-15 12:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-11-18 5:05 ` Richard Stallman
2022-11-18 6:19 ` xenodasein--- via Emacs development discussions.
2022-11-18 6:27 ` Po Lu
2022-11-18 6:32 ` xenodasein--- via Emacs development discussions.
2022-11-18 7:29 ` Po Lu
2022-11-18 8:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-11-18 11:31 ` xenodasein--- via Emacs development discussions.
2022-11-18 11:43 ` Po Lu
2022-11-18 12:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-11-18 6:59 ` tomas
2022-11-18 7:12 ` xenodasein--- via Emacs development discussions.
2022-11-18 14:53 ` Stefan Monnier [this message]
2022-11-18 16:16 ` Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
2022-11-15 13:49 ` Po Lu
2022-11-15 15:54 ` xenodasein--- via Emacs development discussions.
2022-11-15 14:10 ` Stefan Monnier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jwvr0y0nwq1.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org \
--to=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=pappasbrent@knights.ucf.edu \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=xenodasein@tutanota.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).