unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>
To: xenodasein@tutanota.de
Cc: "xenodasein--- viaEmacs development discussions."
	<emacs-devel@gnu.org>, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>,
	 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
	pappasbrent@knights.ucf.edu
Subject: Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 15:29:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h6ywen4x.fsf@yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <NH8R65Z--3-9@tutanota.de> (xenodasein@tutanota.de's message of "Fri, 18 Nov 2022 07:32:39 +0100 (CET)")

xenodasein@tutanota.de writes:

> Lookup why functions are considered an improvement over macros.

I don't.

> As for compiler support, I bet the time spent debugging where there is
> support is going to dwarf where isn't, so trade-off is clear.

You mean, trading debugging time for runtime? That tradeoff was already
made the moment Emacs was written in C, and besides, modern debuginfo
formats already support macros.




  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-18  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-14 18:05 Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions Brent Pappas
2022-11-15 12:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-11-18  5:05   ` Richard Stallman
2022-11-18  6:19     ` xenodasein--- via Emacs development discussions.
2022-11-18  6:27       ` Po Lu
2022-11-18  6:32         ` xenodasein--- via Emacs development discussions.
2022-11-18  7:29           ` Po Lu [this message]
2022-11-18  8:34         ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-11-18 11:31           ` xenodasein--- via Emacs development discussions.
2022-11-18 11:43             ` Po Lu
2022-11-18 12:00             ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-11-18  6:59       ` tomas
2022-11-18  7:12         ` xenodasein--- via Emacs development discussions.
2022-11-18 14:53       ` Stefan Monnier
2022-11-18 16:16         ` Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
2022-11-15 13:49 ` Po Lu
2022-11-15 15:54   ` xenodasein--- via Emacs development discussions.
2022-11-15 14:10 ` Stefan Monnier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87h6ywen4x.fsf@yahoo.com \
    --to=luangruo@yahoo.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=pappasbrent@knights.ucf.edu \
    --cc=rms@gnu.org \
    --cc=xenodasein@tutanota.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).