Re: Why tree-sitter instead of Semantic? (was Re: CC Mode with font-lock-maximum-decoration 2)

["Jostein Kjønigsen" <jostein@secure.kjonigsen.net>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2535 bytes --]

It seems (as usual) the core question asked in the thread gets burried 
in lots of other discussion, which while I'm sure is worthwhile, doesn't 
quite answer the original question.

Specifically I'm referring to the email-topic and the question asked in 
the email:

On 10.08.2022 02:22, Lynn Winebarger wrote:
> I'm curious, though, as to why Semantic/CEDET seems to have been 
> superceded by external solutions like tree-sitter or LSP-based 
> (non-emacs) servers.

Maybe I'm not an average Emacs'er. I'll even be willing to admit that 
one of the main problems here is my lack of knowledge in this matter.

But I've yet to date seen any case where Semantic or CEDET has provided 
me with value as a Emacs end-user and programmer. Maybe it works. Maybe 
it's useful. Maybe it does magical things. But as far as I know, it's a 
mode you can enable, and then .... nothing happens.

Compare that to LSP... I install a package (lsp-client), add the 
relevant hook to prog-mode, and /instantly /every major-mode I interact 
with gets intelligent, contextually correct, auto-complete. I can do 
safe renames across projects, and lots of actual useful, observable 
magic happens. And I get the exact same language support as every other 
editor out there, and I'm not limited to who is willing to contribute to 
the Emacs-ecosystem.

This is why LSP has such great adoption "everywhere",  and became the 
universal standard almost overnight.

If CEDET can do this too... Then why not provide some documentatio or 
guides on how to set it up to be equally useful? If it can't, then one 
needs to clarify what CEDETs role is, in a world where everyone else has 
decided on LSP being the way forward, and provide documentation/guides 
which helps people exploit what CEDET has to offer. Otherwise what I 
suspect is already a niche mode will become, if possible, even more niche.

Back to tree-sitter...I'm not saying that the same thing as LSP is 
guaranteed to happen to tree-sitter, not by far. But it has some of the 
same great things giving it momentum: It's fast (instant?), 
editor-external, meaning it gets contributions from lots of developers 
outside the Emacs ecosystem, and as a result already has parser for 
pretty much all languages out there.

If I'm making a new major-mode these days, for the same reason, I'm 
going to be basing it on tree-sitter in one form or the other.

-- 
Kind regards
*Jostein Kjønigsen*

jostein@kjonigsen.net 🍵 jostein@gmail.com
https://jostein.kjønigsen.no <https://jostein.kjønigsen.no>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4120 bytes --]