From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: next-error-last-buffer
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 16:31:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1BXnGI-0005ac-5b@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4n8yezqr2r.fsf@lifelogs.com> (message from Ted Zlatanov on Mon, 07 Jun 2004 12:18:52 -0400)
Because of the way
next-error crosses modes right now, it may be better off in its own
section, referenced by the compilation-minor-mode and occur
sections.
This is largely a matter of which way produces the most clear and
readable manual. One has to try various methods and see which one
can be made to work best.
This depends on how RMS and others feel about my proposal
for making next-error a next-DWIM interface;
As I explained, I think that is probably a bad idea.
In any case, we don't want to do it for the coming release.
So the coming release needs a manual updated for the current
state of the functionality.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-08 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-09 0:44 next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-09 18:47 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-05-09 23:32 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-10 17:54 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-05-10 18:28 ` next-error-last-buffer Stefan Monnier
2004-05-10 23:45 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-11 12:23 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-05-10 23:35 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-11 2:19 ` next-error-last-buffer Stefan Monnier
2004-05-11 15:36 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-11 23:46 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-12 13:50 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-13 4:15 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-13 13:01 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-12 19:42 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-05-13 4:23 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-13 4:57 ` next-error-last-buffer Miles Bader
2004-05-13 5:17 ` next-error-last-buffer Stefan Monnier
2004-05-13 5:34 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-13 7:28 ` next-error-last-buffer Miles Bader
2004-05-13 12:54 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-14 9:21 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-05-14 14:58 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-15 8:21 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-15 18:34 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-05-15 8:53 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-05-24 8:46 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-24 14:16 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-25 20:09 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-26 13:49 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-27 12:46 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-05-28 15:38 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-28 21:07 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-29 3:47 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-30 14:30 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-06-01 17:41 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-01 17:57 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-02 17:36 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-06-03 15:21 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-04 2:03 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-06-07 16:18 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-08 20:31 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2004-06-30 18:38 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-07-01 17:14 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-05-25 16:06 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-05-25 20:14 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-26 13:56 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-27 21:55 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-27 23:53 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-05-28 15:29 ` next-error-last-buffer Stefan Monnier
2004-05-28 21:55 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-29 3:35 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-29 17:03 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-05-25 20:22 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-29 1:44 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-05-29 23:10 ` next-error-last-buffer Kim F. Storm
2004-05-30 19:41 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-05-31 6:39 ` next-error-last-buffer Werner LEMBERG
2004-05-31 7:20 ` next-error-last-buffer Juanma Barranquero
2004-06-01 17:52 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-01 21:33 ` next-error-last-buffer Kim F. Storm
2004-06-02 17:36 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-06-03 23:42 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-06-05 13:48 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1BXnGI-0005ac-5b@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).