From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: next-error-last-buffer
Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 14:47:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1BMtKq-0001wb-3I@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871xluig40.fsf@mail.jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Sun, 09 May 2004 03:44:31 +0300)
I think that `next-error-last-buffer' should be set buffer-locally
in the compilation buffer
Isn't next-error in a compilation buffer already supposed to operate
on the current buffer? If so, this change would be a no-op.
It might be that this is a cleaner way to implement that feature
than the code that currently implements it.
as well as in every source file visited
from that compilation buffer.
That is an interesting idea, but I think it will screw up the
interaction between compilation and occur, which was the whole point
of the recent changes.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-09 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-09 0:44 next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-09 18:47 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2004-05-09 23:32 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-10 17:54 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-05-10 18:28 ` next-error-last-buffer Stefan Monnier
2004-05-10 23:45 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-11 12:23 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-05-10 23:35 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-11 2:19 ` next-error-last-buffer Stefan Monnier
2004-05-11 15:36 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-11 23:46 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-12 13:50 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-13 4:15 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-13 13:01 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-12 19:42 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-05-13 4:23 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-13 4:57 ` next-error-last-buffer Miles Bader
2004-05-13 5:17 ` next-error-last-buffer Stefan Monnier
2004-05-13 5:34 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-13 7:28 ` next-error-last-buffer Miles Bader
2004-05-13 12:54 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-14 9:21 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-05-14 14:58 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-15 8:21 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-15 18:34 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-05-15 8:53 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-05-24 8:46 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-24 14:16 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-25 20:09 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-26 13:49 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-27 12:46 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-05-28 15:38 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-28 21:07 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-29 3:47 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-30 14:30 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-06-01 17:41 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-01 17:57 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-02 17:36 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-06-03 15:21 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-04 2:03 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-06-07 16:18 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-08 20:31 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-06-30 18:38 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-07-01 17:14 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-05-25 16:06 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-05-25 20:14 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-26 13:56 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-27 21:55 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-27 23:53 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-05-28 15:29 ` next-error-last-buffer Stefan Monnier
2004-05-28 21:55 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-29 3:35 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-29 17:03 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-05-25 20:22 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-05-29 1:44 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-05-29 23:10 ` next-error-last-buffer Kim F. Storm
2004-05-30 19:41 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-05-31 6:39 ` next-error-last-buffer Werner LEMBERG
2004-05-31 7:20 ` next-error-last-buffer Juanma Barranquero
2004-06-01 17:52 ` next-error-last-buffer Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-01 21:33 ` next-error-last-buffer Kim F. Storm
2004-06-02 17:36 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
2004-06-03 23:42 ` next-error-last-buffer Juri Linkov
2004-06-05 13:48 ` next-error-last-buffer Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1BMtKq-0001wb-3I@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).