Re: master 9291e73 02/12: Add new 'declare' forms for command completion predicates

["Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob@tcd.ie>]

Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob@tcd.ie> writes:
>
>> This is the only declare form property that doesn't quote its value,
>> resulting in forms like (declare (completion 'foo)) rather than the more
>> conventional (declare (completion foo)).  How's the following fix?
>
> But you can say
>
> (declare (completion (lambda (...) ...)))

Which my patch will turn into (function (lambda (...) ...)), which is
still correct and should be equivalent.

> So it's a list of functions, not a list of symbols...

What is a list?  The completion-predicate property takes on a single
value satisfying functionp.

Both lambdas and symbols can be functions; my patch treats both equally,
so I see it as the correct treatment of this declare form property.  If
you don't, then please elaborate on why not.

Thanks,

-- 
Basil