From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org>
Cc: raeburn@raeburn.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Can we go GTK-only?
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 05:33:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83lgx5p4zg.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11E61536-1345-4B81-999D-2E17F8B14C62@dancol.org> (message from Daniel Colascione on Sun, 30 Oct 2016 15:49:02 -0700)
> From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org>
> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 15:49:02 -0700
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
>
> The key insight there is that we shouldn't have redisplay *lock* the display matrix and render it. The lisp universe should send a *copy* of the matrix set, then go about its business. This way, redisplay can go display that copy and everything is decoupled. You turn the system into an Erlang like message passing environment.
The glyph matrices are not exposed to Lisp, so there's no issue here
to begin with.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-31 3:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-27 19:54 Can we go GTK-only? Daniel Colascione
2016-10-27 20:05 ` Frank Haun
2016-10-27 20:45 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-10-27 21:08 ` Frank Haun
2016-10-27 20:32 ` Paul Eggert
2016-10-27 23:15 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-10-28 7:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-28 2:35 ` Richard Stallman
2016-10-28 6:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-28 7:27 ` Ulrich Mueller
2016-10-28 8:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-28 10:48 ` Frank Haun
2016-10-28 12:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-28 13:35 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-10-30 14:43 ` Ken Raeburn
2016-10-30 21:42 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-10-30 22:49 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-10-30 23:57 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-10-31 3:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-31 15:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-31 0:00 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2016-10-31 8:24 ` Ken Raeburn
2016-10-31 16:34 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-01 8:22 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2016-10-31 3:33 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2016-10-31 15:57 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-10-31 15:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-31 15:59 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-10-31 16:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-31 17:54 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-10-31 20:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-31 15:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-31 15:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-31 18:22 ` Ken Raeburn
2016-10-31 20:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-31 21:04 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-11-01 15:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 16:28 ` Paul Eggert
2016-11-01 16:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 16:54 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-11-01 17:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 17:16 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-11-01 19:15 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-01 19:28 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2016-11-01 19:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 16:55 ` Paul Eggert
2016-11-01 17:15 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-01 16:41 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-01 16:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 17:22 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-01 17:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 17:56 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-01 19:35 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-01 16:45 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-11-01 17:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 17:06 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-11-01 17:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 17:18 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-11-01 17:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 17:45 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-11-01 19:14 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-11-01 19:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 19:42 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-01 19:20 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-01 20:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 20:17 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-11-01 20:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-02 2:26 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-02 15:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-02 15:55 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-11-02 5:00 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2016-11-02 15:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-03 3:43 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2016-11-03 17:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-02 0:27 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-11-02 15:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-02 16:04 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-11-02 19:25 ` Nikolaus Rath
2016-11-02 19:25 ` Nikolaus Rath
2016-11-02 20:33 ` Paul Eggert
2016-11-03 1:25 ` Richard Stallman
2016-11-02 20:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-03 3:29 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-03 18:07 ` John Wiegley
2016-11-03 22:07 ` John Wiegley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83lgx5p4zg.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=dancol@dancol.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=raeburn@raeburn.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).