* Who is in charge of GNU ELPA?
@ 2020-05-18 4:52 Stefan Monnier
2020-05-18 14:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2020-05-18 4:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-devel
Until a few days ago, I thought I was de facto in charge of GNU ELPA.
But recently it transpired that this is not the case: I was told that
I was not to add `s.el` to GNU ELPA.
So who is?
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: Who is in charge of GNU ELPA?
2020-05-18 4:52 Who is in charge of GNU ELPA? Stefan Monnier
@ 2020-05-18 14:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-05-18 16:41 ` Stefan Monnier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2020-05-18 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: emacs-devel
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 00:52:27 -0400
>
> Until a few days ago, I thought I was de facto in charge of GNU ELPA.
Not sure who you are asking, but from my POV, nothing's changed in
that regard.
> But recently it transpired that this is not the case: I was told that
> I was not to add `s.el` to GNU ELPA.
I wasn't aware that the dispute about s.el has ended, I still see
various proposals being made and discussed. One of the proposals that
can be very relevant is to have two archives, or two separate parts in
ELPA, in which case s.el could be put into one of them with no changes
at all, AFAIU.
So I suggest to finish discussing those proposals, and I hope we will
be able to come to some sort of agreement about some MO that would
allow everyone to live with that.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Who is in charge of GNU ELPA?
2020-05-18 14:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2020-05-18 16:41 ` Stefan Monnier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2020-05-18 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: emacs-devel
>> Until a few days ago, I thought I was de facto in charge of GNU ELPA.
> Not sure who you are asking, but from my POV, nothing's changed in
> that regard.
From my POV it has, because having Richard come and undermine my efforts
without even understand what GNU ELPA is about has significantly dampened
my enthusiasm.
>> But recently it transpired that this is not the case: I was told that
>> I was not to add `s.el` to GNU ELPA.
>
> I wasn't aware that the dispute about s.el has ended, I still see
> various proposals being made and discussed. One of the proposals that
> can be very relevant is to have two archives, or two separate parts in
> ELPA, in which case s.el could be put into one of them with no changes
> at all, AFAIU.
I mostly stopped following those threads: much too depressing.
> So I suggest to finish discussing those proposals, and I hope we will
> be able to come to some sort of agreement about some MO that would
> allow everyone to live with that.
Let me know when something's been decided.
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-05-18 16:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-05-18 4:52 Who is in charge of GNU ELPA? Stefan Monnier
2020-05-18 14:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-05-18 16:41 ` Stefan Monnier
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).