unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: /lib/cpp not found in c-mode
Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 09:54:41 +1200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <17018.38433.218342.918853@farnswood.snap.net.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0FA9201A-8390-4924-BDE3-2857B0A33576@swipnet.se>

 > > If gdb can expand macros using macro information from the executable
 > > (which requires knowledge of include paths and predefined macros), why
 > > can't cpp (or gcc -E) ?
 > >
 > 
 > The information you see in gdb is all from the debug info in the  
 > executable, so it does not require knowledge of include paths and  
 > predefined macros.  The compilation of the executable does, but after  
 > that it is all in the debug info, so gdb does not care what the  
 > include paths where at the time of compilation.
 > 
 >      Jan D.

Sorry, yes you're right it doesn't care what the include paths where. But my
point is that it can expand all the macros while "gcc -E" can't. "gcc -E" is
typically given the source file as input but if it was also given the
executable, it presumably could be adapted so that it could expand all the
macros just like GDB can.

Would that not be a worthwhile thing to do?

Nick

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-05-05 21:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-01 16:47 /lib/cpp not found in c-mode Stefan Monnier
2005-05-01 20:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-02  1:29   ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-02 15:44     ` Stefan Monnier
2005-05-02 21:30       ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-04  9:46       ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-01 23:40 ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-02  4:14   ` Jan D.
2005-05-02  6:46     ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-02 19:58       ` Jan D.
2005-05-02 21:15         ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-02 22:16           ` Stefan Monnier
2005-05-03  4:05             ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-03 15:45               ` Stefan Monnier
2005-05-03 21:36                 ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-03 17:12             ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-03 18:18               ` Stefan Monnier
     [not found]                 ` <20050503233249.1C2799F4ED@mirror.positive-internet.com>
2005-05-03 23:45                   ` Stefan Monnier
2005-05-04 22:05                     ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-04 19:04                 ` Josh Varner
2005-05-03 19:13             ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-03 20:23               ` Stefan Monnier
2005-05-04 20:58                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-05 10:58                   ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-05 17:43                     ` Eli Zaretskii
     [not found]                     ` <0FA9201A-8390-4924-BDE3-2857B0A33576@swipnet.se>
2005-05-05 21:54                       ` Nick Roberts [this message]
2005-05-06  4:51                         ` Jan D.
2005-05-06  7:43                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-03  4:14           ` Jan D.
2005-05-03 19:49           ` Magnus Henoch
2005-05-04 20:49             ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-05 14:17               ` Stefan Monnier
2005-05-05 17:50                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-05 18:19                   ` Stefan Monnier
2005-05-05 21:02                     ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-06 12:34                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-08  2:54                         ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-08  4:28                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-08  4:59                             ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-08 16:12                               ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-08 18:43                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-08 16:12                           ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-08 17:31                         ` Stefan Monnier
2005-05-08 19:02                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-08 19:41                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-08 21:18                             ` Stefan Monnier
2005-05-06 12:49                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-06 22:41                         ` Nick Roberts

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=17018.38433.218342.918853@farnswood.snap.net.nz \
    --to=nickrob@snap.net.nz \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).