unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@gmail.com>
To: Adam Porter <adam@alphapapa.net>
Cc: 68254@debbugs.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, yvv0@proton.me
Subject: bug#68254: EWW ‘readable’ by default
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 22:18:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae2509d3-9ba0-fe01-2528-8c7272001629@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <67bf26f6-382e-4065-8e02-b6433fe78b76@alphapapa.net>

On 3/17/2024 9:32 PM, Adam Porter wrote:
> I'm not sure it would be a good idea to enable eww-readable by default. 
> IME eww-readable is not reliably effective enough to be used by default. 
>   I think that if it were, too many users would find that EWW would 
> produce unusable results by default, and they'd likely blame EWW itself 
> rather than eww-readable, being unaware that eww-readable were even 
> involved.

I agree overall. It's hard to know for sure if a web page will look ok 
in readable mode without trying it first.

That's why I opted to keep the default behavior unchanged in my patch. 
It just makes it possible to add 'eww-readable' to 
'eww-after-render-hook' without producing duplicate history entries. 
That way, if most of the pages you visit *are* readable, you can set it 
up like that and still get to the full view by calling 'eww-readable' again.

> I like Jim's idea of having an option of URL-matching regexps that 
> automatically activate eww-readable.  That does sound useful.

Yeah, I think I might add that in, since 1) I'd find it useful, 2) it 
should be easy, and 3) the Safari browser already supports this, so 
there's already precedent elsewhere. (It's arguably even more relevant 
for EWW than Safari, since many webpages are a real mess in EWW without 
readable-mode.)





  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-18  5:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-05  7:35 bug#68254: EWW ‘readable’ by default Navajeeth via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-01-05 11:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
     [not found]   ` <poNSnv1DQ7L71-FirbCx9nuQ8gqLlPGTIjDYk2pKo2_H3BPuJArYQ2ziQ4pyADSxHCY5cU40D6MUzRqBAZE3pEcFmnzFPD49xunpLyh1UqI=@proton.me>
2024-01-05 13:35     ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-03-17 19:24       ` Jim Porter
2024-03-18  4:32         ` Adam Porter
2024-03-18  5:17           ` Navajeeth via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-03-18  5:44             ` Jim Porter
2024-03-18  5:18           ` Jim Porter [this message]
2024-03-18 12:37         ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-03-19  0:00           ` Jim Porter
2024-03-21 10:51             ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-03-22  5:46               ` Jim Porter
2024-03-23  7:48                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-03-23 17:26                   ` Jim Porter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ae2509d3-9ba0-fe01-2528-8c7272001629@gmail.com \
    --to=jporterbugs@gmail.com \
    --cc=68254@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=adam@alphapapa.net \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=yvv0@proton.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).