From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com>
To: "Mattias Engdegård" <mattiase@acm.org>,
"Shigeru Fukaya" <shigeru.fukaya@gmail.com>
Cc: 44861@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#44861: 27.1; [PATCH] signal in `replace-regexp-in-string'
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:39:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADwFkm=59cqfUCPZNUCvoWv-M-9Jdosq-jQvY7X6MCWKiYGy_Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97535AF5-D542-4267-A5A9-1483C32A61AC@acm.org>
Mattias Engdegård <mattiase@acm.org> writes:
> It is basically your patch but slightly optimised; it turned out that
> the function call and allocation overhead of the original patch made
> it a tad too expensive (a pity, because it was very neat). Now
> performance is about the same as before when the pattern contains no
> submatches, and slightly above (< 10% slower) with one submatch. It
> seems worth the correctness.
Presumably this hasn't worked correctly for a long time, if ever. Is
that correct?
I personally worry about the performance here. Since we use regexps
heavily all over, it is not clear (to me) that 10 % overall performance
drop with subexpressions is worth it to work correctly in these rare
edge-cases. I suppose we do have to fix the bug here, but is it
feasible to solve this in a way that has less performance impact?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-25 21:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-25 4:02 bug#44861: 27.1; [PATCH] signal in `replace-regexp-in-string' Shigeru Fukaya
2020-11-25 10:58 ` Mattias Engdegård
2020-11-25 14:58 ` Mattias Engdegård
2020-11-25 21:39 ` Stefan Kangas [this message]
2020-11-26 12:57 ` Mattias Engdegård
2020-11-26 13:12 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2020-11-26 13:39 ` Mattias Engdegård
2020-11-26 14:03 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2020-11-26 14:54 ` Mattias Engdegård
2020-11-29 13:28 ` Basil L. Contovounesios
2020-11-26 13:43 ` Stefan Kangas
2020-11-26 14:03 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2020-11-26 14:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CADwFkm=59cqfUCPZNUCvoWv-M-9Jdosq-jQvY7X6MCWKiYGy_Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=stefankangas@gmail.com \
--cc=44861@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=mattiase@acm.org \
--cc=shigeru.fukaya@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).