unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* bug#38306: Why the pp-buffer function is not interactive?
@ 2019-11-20 22:26 Aydar Zarifullin
  2019-11-21 13:09 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Aydar Zarifullin @ 2019-11-20 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 38306

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 85 bytes --]

In my opinion it would be convenient if the pp-buffer function was an emacs
command.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 107 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* bug#38306: Why the pp-buffer function is not interactive?
  2019-11-20 22:26 bug#38306: Why the pp-buffer function is not interactive? Aydar Zarifullin
@ 2019-11-21 13:09 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
  2019-11-21 14:29   ` Eli Zaretskii
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2019-11-21 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Aydar Zarifullin; +Cc: 38306

Aydar Zarifullin <aydar.js@gmail.com> writes:

> In my opinion it would be convenient if the pp-buffer function was an emacs
> command.

Make sense to me.  I've now done this in Emacs 27.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* bug#38306: Why the pp-buffer function is not interactive?
  2019-11-21 13:09 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
@ 2019-11-21 14:29   ` Eli Zaretskii
  2019-11-21 17:48     ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2019-11-21 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lars Ingebrigtsen; +Cc: 38306, aydar.js

> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 14:09:42 +0100
> Cc: 38306@debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> Aydar Zarifullin <aydar.js@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > In my opinion it would be convenient if the pp-buffer function was an emacs
> > command.
> 
> Make sense to me.  I've now done this in Emacs 27.

Should this be in NEWS?  How about manuals?

Thanks.





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* bug#38306: Why the pp-buffer function is not interactive?
  2019-11-21 14:29   ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2019-11-21 17:48     ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
  2019-11-21 18:08       ` Eli Zaretskii
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2019-11-21 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: 38306, aydar.js

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> > In my opinion it would be convenient if the pp-buffer function was an emacs
>> > command.
>> 
>> Make sense to me.  I've now done this in Emacs 27.
>
> Should this be in NEWS?  How about manuals?

I didn't think the change deserved either of those things -- pp-buffer
isn't documented, and adding the (interactive) spec to it didn't seem
newsworthy.  

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* bug#38306: Why the pp-buffer function is not interactive?
  2019-11-21 17:48     ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
@ 2019-11-21 18:08       ` Eli Zaretskii
  2019-11-21 22:55         ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2019-11-21 18:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lars Ingebrigtsen; +Cc: 38306, aydar.js

> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Cc: aydar.js@gmail.com,  38306@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:48:37 +0100
> 
> > Should this be in NEWS?  How about manuals?
> 
> I didn't think the change deserved either of those things -- pp-buffer
> isn't documented, and adding the (interactive) spec to it didn't seem
> newsworthy.  

I'm asking whether it should be documented, now that it's a command.
But if you think it's an unimportant command that almost no one will
need to know about, fine with me.





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* bug#38306: Why the pp-buffer function is not interactive?
  2019-11-21 18:08       ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2019-11-21 22:55         ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2019-11-21 22:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: 38306, aydar.js

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> I'm asking whether it should be documented, now that it's a command.
> But if you think it's an unimportant command that almost no one will
> need to know about, fine with me.

Yeah, it's pretty minor, and people can discover it via M-x pp-TAB if
they're into pretty-printing.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-11-21 22:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-11-20 22:26 bug#38306: Why the pp-buffer function is not interactive? Aydar Zarifullin
2019-11-21 13:09 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-11-21 14:29   ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-11-21 17:48     ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-11-21 18:08       ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-11-21 22:55         ` Lars Ingebrigtsen

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).