From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38306: Why the pp-buffer function is not interactive? Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 20:08:03 +0200 Message-ID: <83eey1xfuk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87blt51ill.fsf@gnus.org> <83wobtxpz8.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnhlw26i.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="145746"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 38306@debbugs.gnu.org, aydar.js@gmail.com To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 21 19:08:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iXqsE-000blV-Et for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 19:08:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43376 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iXqsD-0000w5-7X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:08:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45289) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iXqs6-0000vO-RI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:08:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iXqs5-0003ln-VF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:08:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44459) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iXqs5-0003li-SB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:08:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iXqs5-0006f6-Kg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:08:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38306 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 38306-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38306.157435968025601 (code B ref 38306); Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:08:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38306) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Nov 2019 18:08:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53280 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iXqs3-0006er-OW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:08:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36192) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iXqs1-0006ee-KS for 38306@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:07:58 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35950) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iXqrw-0003fS-Hy; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:07:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1234 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iXqrv-0003wL-BA; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:07:51 -0500 In-reply-to: <87pnhlw26i.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:48:37 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:172147 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: aydar.js@gmail.com, 38306@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:48:37 +0100 > > > Should this be in NEWS? How about manuals? > > I didn't think the change deserved either of those things -- pp-buffer > isn't documented, and adding the (interactive) spec to it didn't seem > newsworthy. I'm asking whether it should be documented, now that it's a command. But if you think it's an unimportant command that almost no one will need to know about, fine with me.