unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, johnw@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca,
	6991@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org
Subject: bug#6991: Please keep bytecode out of *Backtrace* buffers
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 10:20:51 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a8cvlcmk.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83eg27bjah.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 19 Nov 2016 17:07:02 +0200")

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net
>> Cc: 6991@debbugs.gnu.org,  lekktu@gmail.com,  johnw@gnu.org,  monnier@iro.umontreal.ca,  larsi@gnus.org,  drew.adams@oracle.com
>> Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 09:39:09 -0500
>> 
>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> >> 
>> >> I would propose something like the below, which will cause the NUL byte
>> >> to be rendered as \0 instead of ^@.  We could potentially do this with
>> >> other control characters too, if they cause trouble too?
>> >
>> > Isn't the fact that copying text into the clipboard stops at the first
>> > null character a Windows-specific issue?  And if it isn't Windows
>> > specific, isn't it at least specific to selections?
>> 
>> It seems to be application specific.  When I copy to a Firefox text area
>> on GNU/Linux I get a truncated result, but using xclip | od -c, I can
>> see the NUL byte and following characters are there.
>
> If this happens on both Windows and X, then both xselect.c and
> w32select.c should "encode" null bytes.  Would that solve the problem?

When printing a string literal, a null byte can be encoded as "\0", but
in general, when copying an arbitrary piece of text this encoding might
not necessarily be correct.

>
>> > Exactly.  But if we change print_object like you suggest, there's no
>> > way of being sure the null bytes won't be mangled by some application
>> > of a print function.
>> 
>> I'm not sure what you mean.
>
> A literal string can be printed, and the result is generally the
> string itself.  But with your suggestion, the null bytes will be
> lossily converted to something else.

I don't think it's lossy.  Furthermore, newlines and form feeds are
already being converted to "\n" and "\f", respectively.  Bytes higher
than 0x80 are also converted to octal escapes.





  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-19 15:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-07  1:35 bug#6991: Please keep bytecode out of *Backtrace* buffers jidanni
2012-02-22  1:02 ` Glenn Morris
2012-02-22 16:43   ` Drew Adams
2012-02-22 17:01     ` Juanma Barranquero
2012-07-02 17:40       ` Drew Adams
2012-07-02 18:38         ` Stefan Monnier
2012-07-02 19:06           ` Drew Adams
2013-01-24 22:43             ` Drew Adams
     [not found]             ` <<FEE817DF5DCC41CD9156B414FF2088D1@us.oracle.com>
2013-08-07 22:25               ` Drew Adams
2016-02-26  6:41           ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2016-02-26 14:11             ` Drew Adams
2016-02-27  0:52               ` John Wiegley
2016-02-27  1:49                 ` Drew Adams
2016-11-19  1:55                   ` npostavs
2016-11-19  2:37                     ` Drew Adams
2016-11-19  7:41                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-19 14:39                       ` npostavs
2016-11-19 15:07                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-19 15:20                           ` npostavs [this message]
2016-11-19 18:34                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-19 22:33                               ` npostavs
2016-11-20 15:46                                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-22 18:07                                   ` Noam Postavsky
2016-11-22 18:52                                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-22 21:07                                       ` Noam Postavsky
2016-11-23 16:05                                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-26 17:18                                           ` npostavs
2016-11-26 18:54                                             ` Stefan Monnier
2017-02-12  2:26                                               ` npostavs
2017-05-28 14:58                                                 ` npostavs
2017-06-24 22:27                                                   ` npostavs
2017-06-25 19:11                                                     ` Stefan Monnier
2017-06-26  3:34                                                       ` npostavs
2017-06-26  4:02                                                         ` Stefan Monnier
2017-06-26 12:50                                                           ` npostavs
2017-06-26 14:54                                                             ` Stefan Monnier
2017-06-27  3:56                                                               ` npostavs
2017-06-27 16:18                                                                 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-06-29 23:52                                                                   ` npostavs
2016-11-26 23:45                                             ` Richard Stallman
2016-11-27  0:33                                               ` Noam Postavsky
2016-11-27  3:34                                                 ` Clément Pit--Claudel
2016-11-27  3:36                                                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-27 14:10                                                   ` Noam Postavsky
2016-11-27 23:21                                                 ` Richard Stallman
2016-11-19 17:08                       ` Richard Stallman
2016-02-27  4:13                 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2017-09-11 10:57 ` bug#6991: Rocky Bernstein
2017-09-11 14:28   ` bug#6991: Eli Zaretskii
2017-09-13  1:13     ` bug#6991: Rocky Bernstein

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87a8cvlcmk.fsf@users.sourceforge.net \
    --to=npostavs@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=6991@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=johnw@gnu.org \
    --cc=larsi@gnus.org \
    --cc=lekktu@gmail.com \
    --cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).