From: "J.P." <jp@neverwas.me>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>,
Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
Cc: 57956@debbugs.gnu.org, Magnus Henoch <magnus.henoch@gmail.com>,
emacs-erc@gnu.org
Subject: bug#57956: 29.0.50; Add minimal authorization support to sasl-scram-rfc
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 06:17:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a66ssw7s.fsf__33782.132323698$1663769808$gmane$org@neverwas.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tu52awv9.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 20 Sep 2022 17:28:26 +0200")
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
> "J.P." <jp@neverwas.me> writes:
>
>> Anyway, ERC would benefit greatly from these (or superior) changes
>> because we'd like to introduce `erc-compat' analogs in an upcoming
>> release (probably ERC 5.6). If anyone out there can spare the time,
>> your feedback would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Looks OK to me.
Cool, thanks.
* * *
Question for Philip (Cc'd):
Hi. When 29.1 is released, I might want to propose some of these updated
sasl-scram-rfc.el items for inclusion in Compat. However, one of them,
`sasl-scram--client-final-message'
is obviously an internal function. Does that matter? Would you rather we
export it (as in rename it or alias it) beforehand (IOW, now)?
Thanks,
J.P.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-21 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <871qs62o0y.fsf@neverwas.me>
2022-09-20 15:28 ` bug#57956: 29.0.50; Add minimal authorization support to sasl-scram-rfc Lars Ingebrigtsen
[not found] ` <87tu52awv9.fsf@gnus.org>
2022-09-21 13:17 ` J.P. [this message]
[not found] ` <87a66ssw7s.fsf@neverwas.me>
2022-09-21 18:35 ` Philip Kaludercic
[not found] ` <871qs4mv7a.fsf@posteo.net>
2022-09-22 6:23 ` J.P.
[not found] ` <875yhggc5s.fsf@neverwas.me>
2022-09-23 13:37 ` Philip Kaludercic
[not found] ` <875yheus8g.fsf@posteo.net>
2022-09-28 1:22 ` J.P.
2022-10-26 13:13 ` J.P.
2022-09-20 13:06 J.P.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='87a66ssw7s.fsf__33782.132323698$1663769808$gmane$org@neverwas.me' \
--to=jp@neverwas.me \
--cc=57956@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-erc@gnu.org \
--cc=larsi@gnus.org \
--cc=magnus.henoch@gmail.com \
--cc=philipk@posteo.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).