From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "J.P." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57956: 29.0.50; Add minimal authorization support to sasl-scram-rfc Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 06:17:27 -0700 Message-ID: <87a66ssw7s.fsf__33782.132323698$1663769808$gmane$org@neverwas.me> References: <871qs62o0y.fsf@neverwas.me> <87tu52awv9.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38489"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 57956@debbugs.gnu.org, Magnus Henoch , emacs-erc@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 21 16:16:42 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ob0Wn-0009rY-Om for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 16:16:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34320 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ob0Wm-0005e7-8A for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 10:16:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33476) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oazc3-0001is-6C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 09:18:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33892) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oazc2-0002zt-8y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 09:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oazc1-0007SU-R4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 09:18:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "J.P." Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 13:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57956 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 57956-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57956.166376626228641 (code B ref 57956); Wed, 21 Sep 2022 13:18:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57956) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Sep 2022 13:17:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32970 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oazbh-0007Rs-P1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 09:17:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-108-mta166.mxroute.com ([136.175.108.166]:42641) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oazbg-0007Rd-FJ for 57956@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 09:17:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-111-mta2.mxroute.com ([136.175.111.2] filter006.mxroute.com) (Authenticated sender: mN4UYu2MZsgR) by mail-108-mta166.mxroute.com (ZoneMTA) with ESMTPSA id 183603246b00002b7a.001 for <57956@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256); Wed, 21 Sep 2022 13:17:31 +0000 X-Zone-Loop: 7ac9d0dc3e8270581e7b638b9d1f608acdeddbc3a0c6 X-Originating-IP: [136.175.111.2] DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=neverwas.me ; s=x; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To: Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=2M/UwerS4hI7O9kCEQI4mORZIC/QQnbZoIxaNxugjEM=; b=IG9uvjoyr66MVPanIkBYXBp40B 0ldDGBmdnRjr2lcgDOruueZe+H9nNK+uo9I713fB9Oyt8Xse17gIhUCFZD4fKvUgAsW+yKXwqJayQ eI48eB90sk3xcza+Ous0hXx8DRRMj7eJmVUG5qhNPz2K3nhByUzjhQcSPvNlGyOVU5N+vmyp6xYh4 heiv13MTMY6W79QVN1Z/RVqMsL+97yXlq5ZA1swEGtsixh1tcQgSxlU8ds+xT7OHj2AOuIBlwd/Dy YnwpGWGyWR6Lwk6skMYgq1mpkgFYtjLWbUb40F7pE4e61n4LrvsSL78HbvA4xDP0S/ina+7+Ij/qk 7GsPptsQ==; In-Reply-To: <87tu52awv9.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 20 Sep 2022 17:28:26 +0200") X-Authenticated-Id: masked@neverwas.me X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:243358 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > "J.P." writes: > >> Anyway, ERC would benefit greatly from these (or superior) changes >> because we'd like to introduce `erc-compat' analogs in an upcoming >> release (probably ERC 5.6). If anyone out there can spare the time, >> your feedback would be greatly appreciated. > > Looks OK to me. Cool, thanks. * * * Question for Philip (Cc'd): Hi. When 29.1 is released, I might want to propose some of these updated sasl-scram-rfc.el items for inclusion in Compat. However, one of them, `sasl-scram--client-final-message' is obviously an internal function. Does that matter? Would you rather we export it (as in rename it or alias it) beforehand (IOW, now)? Thanks, J.P.