From: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de>
To: "Gerd Möllmann" <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
Cc: brandon.irizarry@gmail.com, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
65344@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#65344: 28.2; Unable to Edebug cl-flet form which uses argument destructuring
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2023 05:57:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877cpqs6vi.fsf@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ef55cf24-d9b1-7a80-5da6-6eac3a4d0214@gmail.com> ("Gerd Möllmann"'s message of "Sat, 19 Aug 2023 10:08:24 +0200")
Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com> writes:
> (debug ((&rest [&or (&define [&name symbolp "@cl-flet@"]
> [&name [] gensym] ;Make it unique!
> cl-lambda-list
> cl-declarations-or-string
> [&optional ("interactive" interactive)]
> def-body)
> (&define [&name symbolp "@cl-flet@"]
> [&name [] gensym] ;Make it unique!
> def-body)])
> The second &define is for the (FN EXPR) bindings. It comes after the
> &define for "normal" function bindings because because, for some
> reason, apparently the second &define also matches the other case.
That's because you use 'def-body' which matches any number of body
expressions. I think this is not correct: we are expecting a single
form.
Apart from that: yes, something like this... I did not yet understand
the &name magic.
And i wonder whether we should apply the distributive law and factor out
the first few identical specs inside the &or.
Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-20 3:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-16 18:21 bug#65344: 28.2; Unable to Edebug cl-flet form which uses argument destructuring Brandon Irizarry
2023-08-17 0:55 ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-08-17 5:29 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-08-17 15:42 ` Brandon Irizarry
2023-08-17 15:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-08-17 18:23 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-08-17 23:07 ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-08-18 5:19 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-08-18 5:58 ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-08-18 6:43 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-08-19 8:08 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-08-20 3:57 ` Michael Heerdegen [this message]
2023-08-20 5:32 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-08-20 6:08 ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-08-20 6:48 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-08-21 1:19 ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-08-21 7:01 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-08-21 7:10 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-08-21 7:30 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-08-22 0:54 ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-08-22 5:48 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-08-22 6:10 ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-08-22 8:05 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-08-22 21:06 ` Brandon Irizarry
2023-08-23 0:35 ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-08-23 0:32 ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-08-23 1:25 ` Drew Adams
2023-08-23 6:06 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-08-23 14:23 ` Drew Adams
2023-08-24 3:16 ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-08-24 9:10 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-08-24 23:04 ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-08-25 1:53 ` Drew Adams
2023-08-25 4:07 ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-08-25 14:50 ` Drew Adams
2023-08-26 0:16 ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-08-26 2:02 ` Drew Adams
2023-08-20 4:39 ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-08-20 5:15 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-08-23 9:25 ` Mattias Engdegård
2023-08-23 9:31 ` Mattias Engdegård
2023-08-23 11:10 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-08-23 14:08 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-08-24 1:14 ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-08-24 6:17 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-08-25 4:10 ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-08-25 6:19 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-08-25 4:22 ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-08-25 6:33 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-08-25 17:53 ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-08-26 5:39 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-08-27 4:02 ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-08-27 6:34 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-09-01 23:24 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-09-02 5:10 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-09-02 17:04 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-09-02 19:27 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-09-03 5:51 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-09-03 16:09 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-09-03 16:47 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-09-04 21:14 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-08-23 9:33 ` Gerd Möllmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877cpqs6vi.fsf@web.de \
--to=michael_heerdegen@web.de \
--cc=65344@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=brandon.irizarry@gmail.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gerd.moellmann@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).