unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl>
To: nipponpost@airmail.cc
Cc: bug-gnu-emacs
	<bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+nipponpost=airmail.cc@gnu.org>,
	rms@gnu.org, 38002@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#38002: Please remove this joke
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 17:23:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874kzna7mb.fsf@mbork.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c68f0eddf6423a19606ce746fc4d7443@airmail.cc>


On 2019-11-01, at 16:24, nipponpost@airmail.cc wrote:

> Deleting any jokes (including the one you're acquiescent to removal),
> after accepting the persons work (the code that came along with the
> joke) is extremely disrespectful to the person who did the programming
> work along-side it.

I haven't thought about it this way, but it seems to make sense.  On
closer inspection however, it only _seems_ to make sense, but it
actually does not.

Consider a bad joke a _bug_.  We _want_ to remove bugs from Emacs (or
any other software for that matter).

The problem is, this one particular joke isn't bad at all, quite the
opposite - irrespective whether one laughs at women or hacker's
stereotype of women.  (I think both interpretations are valid, and none
is too offensive for my taste.  The previous joke in the file is
definitely more offensive, for instance.)  IOW, I consider it a feature,
not a bug.  (And I repeated it to many of my friends, and we all had
a good laugh.)

> (And I mean /that/ person, including a time-period element (people
> change, sadly, they're always better when they're younger: when
> they're old they simply give up and obey).)

This, too, is plainly false.  In general, I would rather expect older
people "better" (for some very specific meaning of "better", definitely
not the moral one), due to experience.

> If we liked them we would not waste our lives programming: we would
> chase the women. There is a reason we have the time to do the free
> software programing and media creation. The fact is we tacitly reject
> them because they are tyrants (they would say they rejected us: just
> as they attacked you, RMS, in the past saying you would "never get
> laid" when you asked them to stop sending birth announcements to the
> list), slave drivers, and banned everything we /actually/ wanted
> (marrying /girls/ not /women/).

This is not only false perspective, but it is plainly dangerous.
Pitting men against women (or women against men) is exactly what
feminists do, and it is one of the reasons feminism is such a poison for
the society.

I have a loving wife.  I am a programmer.  I can't see any contradiction
here.  (Happily, my wife is not a feminist - I wouldn't marry one,
anyway.)

BTW, I also know some female programmers.  Not many, but still.

Just my few cents.

Best,

--
Marcin Borkowski
http://mbork.pl





  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-01 16:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-31 14:29 bug#38002: Please remove this joke Cecilio Pardo
2019-10-31 15:46 ` Stefan Kangas
2019-10-31 16:22   ` Marcin Borkowski
2019-10-31 20:24     ` Robert Pluim
2019-10-31 16:25   ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-10-31 19:24     ` Glenn Morris
2019-10-31 23:12       ` Juanma Barranquero
2019-11-01  0:40         ` nipponpost
2019-11-01 13:15         ` Filipp Gunbin
2019-11-01 14:29           ` Richard Stallman
2019-11-01 15:24             ` nipponpost
2019-11-01 16:23               ` Marcin Borkowski [this message]
2019-11-01 20:13                 ` cpardo
2019-11-01 23:13                   ` nipponpost
2019-11-02  8:46                   ` Marcin Borkowski
     [not found]                     ` <237201ce8334abb8f7dfb4612ed9db08@airmail.cc>
2019-11-03 13:21                       ` Richard Stallman
2019-11-01 20:30                 ` nipponpost
2019-11-02  8:52                   ` Marcin Borkowski
2019-11-01 16:21             ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-11-01 23:25               ` nipponpost
2019-11-02  2:14                 ` Juanma Barranquero
2019-11-02 15:57                   ` nipponpost
2019-11-01  2:22 ` Richard Stallman
2019-11-01 12:55 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
     [not found] ` <mailman.425.1572711186.13325.bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2019-11-02 21:06   ` Alan Mackenzie
2019-11-03 16:45     ` bug#38002: Please remove this joke - Informing of legal rights is not a threat - 35 year copyright recovery for non-works-for-hire nipponpost
2019-11-03 17:01       ` bug#38002: Please remove this joke Lars Ingebrigtsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874kzna7mb.fsf@mbork.pl \
    --to=mbork@mbork.pl \
    --cc=38002@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+nipponpost=airmail.cc@gnu.org \
    --cc=nipponpost@airmail.cc \
    --cc=rms@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).