From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Sam Halliday <sam.halliday@gmail.com>
Cc: 24358@debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net
Subject: bug#24358: 25.1.50; re-search-forward errors with "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size"
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 22:10:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83lgxenao0.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALR_T9DE4nrV9OiJUCW_h7A8oCmeCY8yfD5zdrYNW8a=Rf9e6w@mail.gmail.com> (message from Sam Halliday on Sun, 23 Oct 2016 19:16:18 +0100)
> From: Sam Halliday <sam.halliday@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 19:16:18 +0100
> Cc: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, 24358@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> Your patch suggestion results in a failure at 20% in the test for me.
So none of the 2 patches work. Which doesn't surprise me: the first
was a stab in the dark anyway, and the second is unrelated to the
problem you reported.
> I wish we knew what was causing this to fail on my OS but not yours.
My build doesn't use ralloc.c. It's that simple.
> You could perhaps try with an recent archlinux image.
What for? The problem is clear from your last Lisp backtrace: a call
to string-match returns bad data, which then barfs when used in the
following call to substring.
The problem is to find the code which causes this. Hmm...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-23 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-26 20:17 bug#24315: 25.1.50; re-search-forward errors with "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size" Peder O. Klingenberg
2016-08-27 3:35 ` npostavs
2016-08-30 13:09 ` Peder O. Klingenberg
2016-09-02 1:58 ` npostavs
2016-09-02 13:45 ` Peder O. Klingenberg
2016-09-03 14:21 ` npostavs
2016-09-06 8:18 ` Peder O. Klingenberg
2016-09-07 23:27 ` npostavs
2016-09-03 15:43 ` bug#24358: " npostavs
2016-10-08 0:29 ` npostavs
2016-10-08 5:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-08 13:45 ` npostavs
2016-10-08 14:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-08 14:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-08 16:57 ` npostavs
2016-10-08 17:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-08 18:52 ` npostavs
2016-10-08 19:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-08 20:55 ` npostavs
2016-10-09 6:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-13 1:29 ` npostavs
2016-10-13 6:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-14 2:19 ` npostavs
2016-10-14 7:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-19 3:11 ` npostavs
2016-10-19 7:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-19 12:29 ` npostavs
2016-10-19 14:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-20 4:31 ` npostavs
2016-10-20 8:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-21 1:22 ` npostavs
2016-10-21 7:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-22 2:36 ` npostavs
2016-10-22 21:54 ` Sam Halliday
2016-10-22 22:46 ` npostavs
2016-10-23 6:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-23 8:57 ` Sam Halliday
2016-10-23 9:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-23 13:40 ` Sam Halliday
2016-10-23 14:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-23 15:42 ` Sam Halliday
2016-10-23 15:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-23 15:58 ` Sam Halliday
2016-10-23 15:58 ` Sam Halliday
2016-10-23 16:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-23 17:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-23 18:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-23 18:14 ` Noam Postavsky
2016-10-23 19:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-24 13:29 ` npostavs
2016-10-24 13:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-24 15:33 ` Noam Postavsky
2016-10-24 16:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-25 2:00 ` npostavs
2016-10-25 16:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-26 0:16 ` npostavs
2016-10-24 13:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-24 14:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-24 20:13 ` Sam Halliday
2016-10-24 23:44 ` npostavs
2016-11-07 3:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-07 3:56 ` Noam Postavsky
2016-11-07 15:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-23 18:16 ` Sam Halliday
2016-10-23 19:10 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2016-10-23 19:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-23 20:15 ` Sam Halliday
2016-10-23 20:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-23 20:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-23 23:18 ` Noam Postavsky
2016-10-24 7:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-24 8:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-23 18:11 ` Sam Halliday
2016-10-18 8:16 ` bug#24358: 25.1.50; Sam Halliday
2016-10-18 8:56 ` Sam Halliday
2016-10-18 9:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83lgxenao0.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=24358@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=npostavs@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=sam.halliday@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).