From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net
Cc: sam.halliday@gmail.com, 24358@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#24358: 25.1.50; re-search-forward errors with "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size"
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 23:18:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83h982n7k4.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83insin9n8.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sun, 23 Oct 2016 22:32:59 +0300)
Noam, there's something I don't understand here: why is regex.c using
malloc for allocating the failure stack? AFAICS, REGEX_MALLOC is not
defined, so the only way I can explain this to myself is that we use
SAFE_ALLOCA, and that falls back to malloc because the failure stack
needs more than 16KB of memory. Is that correct?
If so, then one other way of solving the original problem that doesn't
open the gates of the ralloc.c hell is to allow a larger amount of
stack allocations in regex.c before we fall back to malloc. Since the
maximum size of the failure stack is limited by something like 800KB,
and the C stack limit is set in main.c to allow the failure stack be
allocated off the stack, why don't we make use of this fact?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-23 20:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-26 20:17 bug#24315: 25.1.50; re-search-forward errors with "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size" Peder O. Klingenberg
2016-08-27 3:35 ` npostavs
2016-08-30 13:09 ` Peder O. Klingenberg
2016-09-02 1:58 ` npostavs
2016-09-02 13:45 ` Peder O. Klingenberg
2016-09-03 14:21 ` npostavs
2016-09-06 8:18 ` Peder O. Klingenberg
2016-09-07 23:27 ` npostavs
2016-09-03 15:43 ` bug#24358: " npostavs
2016-10-08 0:29 ` npostavs
2016-10-08 5:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-08 13:45 ` npostavs
2016-10-08 14:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-08 14:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-08 16:57 ` npostavs
2016-10-08 17:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-08 18:52 ` npostavs
2016-10-08 19:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-08 20:55 ` npostavs
2016-10-09 6:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-13 1:29 ` npostavs
2016-10-13 6:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-14 2:19 ` npostavs
2016-10-14 7:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-19 3:11 ` npostavs
2016-10-19 7:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-19 12:29 ` npostavs
2016-10-19 14:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-20 4:31 ` npostavs
2016-10-20 8:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-21 1:22 ` npostavs
2016-10-21 7:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-22 2:36 ` npostavs
2016-10-22 21:54 ` Sam Halliday
2016-10-22 22:46 ` npostavs
2016-10-23 6:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-23 8:57 ` Sam Halliday
2016-10-23 9:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-23 13:40 ` Sam Halliday
2016-10-23 14:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-23 15:42 ` Sam Halliday
2016-10-23 15:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-23 15:58 ` Sam Halliday
2016-10-23 15:58 ` Sam Halliday
2016-10-23 16:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-23 17:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-23 18:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-23 18:14 ` Noam Postavsky
2016-10-23 19:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-24 13:29 ` npostavs
2016-10-24 13:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-24 15:33 ` Noam Postavsky
2016-10-24 16:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-25 2:00 ` npostavs
2016-10-25 16:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-26 0:16 ` npostavs
2016-10-24 13:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-24 14:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-24 20:13 ` Sam Halliday
2016-10-24 23:44 ` npostavs
2016-11-07 3:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-07 3:56 ` Noam Postavsky
2016-11-07 15:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-23 18:16 ` Sam Halliday
2016-10-23 19:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-23 19:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-23 20:15 ` Sam Halliday
2016-10-23 20:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-23 20:18 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2016-10-23 23:18 ` Noam Postavsky
2016-10-24 7:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-24 8:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-23 18:11 ` Sam Halliday
2016-10-18 8:16 ` bug#24358: 25.1.50; Sam Halliday
2016-10-18 8:56 ` Sam Halliday
2016-10-18 9:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83h982n7k4.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=24358@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=npostavs@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=sam.halliday@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).