From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24358: 25.1.50; re-search-forward errors with "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size" Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 22:10:55 +0300 Message-ID: <83lgxenao0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87eg3rvtsf.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83k2dihpm9.fsf@gnu.org> <8760p2wzgj.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <838ttyhhzu.fsf@gnu.org> <871szqwu51.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <831szqhbc2.fsf@gnu.org> <87h98hujcx.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <831szkahyz.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg3jvfj6.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <8360ov8lbu.fsf@gnu.org> <877f95uj66.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83zim0vn1t.fsf@gnu.org> <874m48v7wj.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83insov1zr.fsf@gnu.org> <87zilztzd5.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83oa2ftnvp.fsf@gnu.org> <87wph2ts1a.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83oa2erx0k.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgxht8hp.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <871sz8kq2v.fsf@gmail.com> <87shroroh8.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <838ttfpnxt.fsf@gnu.org> <83vawjo21l.fsf@gnu.org> <83bmybnopx.fsf@gnu.org> <8360ojnk0n.fsf@gnu.org> <83twc3m198.fsf@gnu.org> <83pomrlz27.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1477249951 14910 195.159.176.226 (23 Oct 2016 19:12:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 19:12:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 24358@debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: Sam Halliday Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 23 21:12:26 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1byOBp-0001QR-0V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 21:12:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42119 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byOBr-0007Hs-BX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:12:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37301) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byOBh-0007G8-8j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:12:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byOBe-0007FX-4X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:12:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34453) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byOBe-0007FR-1A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1byOBd-0007lz-Pc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:12:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 19:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24358 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch fixed Original-Received: via spool by 24358-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24358.147724986929810 (code B ref 24358); Sun, 23 Oct 2016 19:12:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24358) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Oct 2016 19:11:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49849 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1byOAn-0007kk-Gm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:11:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46200) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1byOAm-0007kY-1k for 24358@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:11:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byOAd-00074c-I9 for 24358@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:37752) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byOAd-00074W-Ee; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:10:59 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3293 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1byOAc-0006MU-Kl; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:10:59 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Sam Halliday on Sun, 23 Oct 2016 19:16:18 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:124928 Archived-At: > From: Sam Halliday > Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 19:16:18 +0100 > Cc: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, 24358@debbugs.gnu.org > > Your patch suggestion results in a failure at 20% in the test for me. So none of the 2 patches work. Which doesn't surprise me: the first was a stab in the dark anyway, and the second is unrelated to the problem you reported. > I wish we knew what was causing this to fail on my OS but not yours. My build doesn't use ralloc.c. It's that simple. > You could perhaps try with an recent archlinux image. What for? The problem is clear from your last Lisp backtrace: a call to string-match returns bad data, which then barfs when used in the following call to substring. The problem is to find the code which causes this. Hmm...