unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: dick.r.chiang@gmail.com
Cc: 36609@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#36609: 27.0.50; Possible race-condition in threading implementation
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 17:18:54 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8335tpdcq9.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bl8e2aya.fsf@dick> (dick.r.chiang@gmail.com)

> From: dick.r.chiang@gmail.com
> Cc: 36609@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 07:52:45 -0400
> 
> > a single word...  change should ... be atomic.
> 
> I've never heard that.

The idea is that a variable that is modified in a single machine
instruction will always have the value assigned by the last thread
which set that.  You cannot have, for example, half of the bits of the
variable set by one thread and the other half by another thread.

> Adding the volatile qualifier to `threads_holding_glib_lock` did not 
> resolve my MRE on my particular architecture (whatever that may be).

So can you describe what you think happens in your scenario that the
offending change that added threads_holding_glib_lock causes?  Because
I still don't see the connection, to tell the truth.





  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-10 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-11 20:51 bug#36609: 27.0.50; Possible race-condition in threading implementation Andreas Politz
2019-07-12  7:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-07-12  8:05   ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-07-12  9:02 ` Pip Cet
2019-07-12 12:42   ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-07-12 12:57     ` Pip Cet
2019-07-12 13:31       ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-07-12 13:51         ` Pip Cet
2019-07-12 15:05           ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-07-12 18:06             ` Pip Cet
2019-07-12 18:27               ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-07-12 18:34                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-07-12 19:24                   ` Pip Cet
2019-07-12 19:57                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-07-13 14:37                       ` Pip Cet
2019-07-13 15:03                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-07-13 15:13                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-07-13 15:54                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-07-13 15:57                             ` Pip Cet
2019-07-13 16:02                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-07-13 18:17                                 ` Pip Cet
2020-08-21 12:57                                   ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-07-13 15:04                         ` Andreas Politz
2019-07-12 12:44   ` Pip Cet
2019-07-12 12:55     ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-07-12 13:40       ` Pip Cet
2019-07-12 13:51         ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-07-12 14:34           ` Pip Cet
2019-07-12 15:02             ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-07-12 19:30               ` Pip Cet
2019-07-13  6:50                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-06-06 15:50 ` dick.r.chiang
     [not found] ` <87fsxv8182.fsf@dick>
2021-06-06 16:35   ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-06-06 19:10     ` dick.r.chiang
2021-06-06 19:27       ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-06-09 21:40         ` dick.r.chiang
2021-06-10  6:46           ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-06-10 11:52             ` dick.r.chiang
2021-06-10 14:18               ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2021-06-10 14:55                 ` dick.r.chiang
2021-06-10 15:04                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-06-10 21:36                     ` dick.r.chiang
2021-06-11  6:00                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-06-19 17:53                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-06-19 19:14                           ` dick.r.chiang
2021-06-19 19:18                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-06-19 21:12                               ` dick.r.chiang
2021-06-20 11:39                                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-06-20 14:01                                   ` dick.r.chiang
2021-06-20 15:53                                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-06-25 13:54                                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-06-10 15:35                 ` Andreas Schwab
2021-06-10 15:39                   ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8335tpdcq9.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=36609@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=dick.r.chiang@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).