unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de>
Cc: mattias.engdegard@gmail.com, 61730@debbugs.gnu.org,
	monnier@iro.umontreal.ca
Subject: bug#61730: 30.0.50; Compiler warnings for delq and delete
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 17:29:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <831qmfnkto.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fsavf688.fsf@web.de> (message from Michael Heerdegen on Fri, 24 Feb 2023 16:11:51 +0100)

> From: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de>
> Cc: Mattias Engdegård <mattias.engdegard@gmail.com>,
>   61730@debbugs.gnu.org,
>   monnier@iro.umontreal.ca
> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 16:11:51 +0100
> 
> But yes, we would warn about some legitimate and safe calls.  The
> advantages outweigh the disadvantages in my opinion.

Not in my opinion.  I'm sick and tired from seeing compilers emitting
bogus warnings which require one to spend time verifying perfectly
correct code, or, worse, modify the code to shut up the compiler.  Do
we really want to see stuff like

  (setq _ (delq ...))

in our code?

> > please try not to emit the warning in those cases.
> 
> I think this is impossible.  The compiler can't know or prove whether
> the element to delete is different from the first one.

If it's really impossible (and I'm not sure it is), then the better
course of action is to emit the warnings only if the byte compiler was
requested to be more sensitive to potential issues, similar to GCC's
"-W*" options.  IOW, if someone wants to lint their code, let them ask
for a linting compilation.





  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-24 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-23 10:29 bug#61730: 30.0.50; Compiler warnings for delq and delete Michael Heerdegen
2023-02-24  3:59 ` Richard Stallman
2023-02-24 13:43 ` Mattias Engdegård
2023-02-24 13:56   ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-24 15:11     ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-02-24 15:29       ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2023-02-24 15:45         ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-02-24 15:48           ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-24 16:17             ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-02-24 16:45               ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-02-24 19:33                 ` Mattias Engdegård
2023-02-24 20:20                   ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-02-25  9:40                     ` Mattias Engdegård
2023-02-25  4:15       ` Richard Stallman
2023-02-25  8:11         ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-25 12:34           ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-02-25 13:25             ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-25 15:09               ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-02-25 15:29                 ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-02-25 15:48                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-27  3:22                   ` Richard Stallman
2023-02-27 10:37                     ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-02-27 11:37                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-27  3:24           ` Richard Stallman
2023-02-27 11:44             ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-24 15:52   ` Mattias Engdegård
2023-02-24 16:37     ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-04-09 16:41 ` Mattias Engdegård
2023-05-01 16:06   ` Mattias Engdegård
2023-05-20  1:57     ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-05-20  9:14       ` Mattias Engdegård
2023-05-21  0:56         ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-05-21  3:01           ` Ruijie Yu via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-05-21  3:57             ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-05-21  5:55               ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-21  8:42               ` Mattias Engdegård
2023-05-31 14:38         ` Mattias Engdegård
2023-06-01  0:48           ` Michael Heerdegen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=831qmfnkto.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=61730@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=mattias.engdegard@gmail.com \
    --cc=michael_heerdegen@web.de \
    --cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).