unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Boruch Baum <boruch_baum@gmx.com>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
Cc: 43961@debbugs.gnu.org, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Subject: bug#43961: read carefully: dired-file-name-at-point vs dired-filename-at-point
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 06:25:12 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201013102511.5nuu3p3dcyr6poft@E15-2016.optimum.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87blh667zs.fsf@gnus.org>

On 2020-10-13 06:54, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
> Boruch Baum <boruch_baum@gmx.com> writes:
>
> > They return different values. One returns an expanded (canonical)
> > path-name, and the other an abbreviated one.
>
> Why not just have one call the other, and wrap the results in
> abbreviate-file-name?

You could, but you wouldn't be saving anything since the inner function
would still need to perform the expansion, so for the abbreviated
function you end up in effect with an inefficient (abbrev (expand file))
instead of a choice between (abbrev file) or (expand file).

Also, much of the change ends up being defaliases, docstrings and
deprecation notices, so its more clearly presented without nesting
functions.

--
hkp://keys.gnupg.net
CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1  7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0





  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-13 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-12 14:26 bug#43961: read carefully: dired-file-name-at-point vs dired-filename-at-point Boruch Baum
2020-10-13  3:49 ` Richard Stallman
2020-10-13  4:08   ` Boruch Baum
2020-10-13  4:54     ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2020-10-13 10:25       ` Boruch Baum [this message]
2020-10-13 10:58         ` Arthur Miller
2020-10-13 11:27           ` Boruch Baum
2020-10-14  3:45         ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2020-10-14  4:19           ` Boruch Baum
2020-10-14  4:43     ` Richard Stallman
2020-10-14  4:58       ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2020-10-15  3:57         ` Richard Stallman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201013102511.5nuu3p3dcyr6poft@E15-2016.optimum.net \
    --to=boruch_baum@gmx.com \
    --cc=43961@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=larsi@gnus.org \
    --cc=rms@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).