From: Boruch Baum <boruch_baum@gmx.com>
To: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@gmx.de>
Cc: 43412@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#43412: [FEATURE] autorevert-only-if-visible [PATCH]
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 16:03:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200917192925.4ponjwm7emwsoxvn@E15-2016.optimum.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y2l8slux.fsf@gmx.de>
On 2020-09-17 13:07, Michael Albinus wrote:
> Boruch Baum <boruch_baum@gmx.com> writes:
>
> Hi Boruch,
>
> >> I haven't tested your patch, but I'm asking myself whether it cooperates
> >> with autorevert triggered by file notifications.
> >> ...
> >> Have you tested this scenario?
> >
> > YES! In fact, that was a major motivation for the submission, and
> > the primary method of testing it.
> >
> > Please do test the patch, and report back.
>
> I see (still haven't tested, just reviewing).
Actually testing the code would be helpful. I'm beginning to feel the
'crunch' in pre-holiday preparations for Jewish New Years, so you're on
your own until at least sometime Monday.
> I don't understand yet, why it is necessary to move "(setq
> auto-revert-notify-modified-p nil)" into the "(when (and revert ..."
> form.
The reset was being applied too broadly and preventing auto-reverts from
occurring when they needed to be. I don't have the specific key-sequence
handy, but it should be clear if you try the code with/without it in
common auto-revert-if-not-visible scenarios.
> Furthermore, I see a problem to call auto-revert functionality in
> files.el. autorevert.el is not dumped into the emacs binary.
I don't understand what you mean. What's the problem?
> Wouldn't it be better to add a function to find-file-hook?
Tried it, and it was insufficient.
> I understand the problem with adding a newline at file end
I don't. AFAIK, it has nothing to do with my patch.
> but maybe this could be solved differently?
Don't know what you mean. What are you suggesting?
Like I mentioned earlier, I need a few days for the Holiday. If you can
test the patch, that would be great.
--
hkp://keys.gnupg.net
CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-17 20:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-15 4:07 bug#43412: [FEATURE] autorevert-only-if-visible [PATCH] Boruch Baum
2020-09-15 14:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-09-15 15:39 ` Boruch Baum
2020-09-15 15:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-09-15 16:12 ` Boruch Baum
2020-09-15 17:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-09-16 20:11 ` Boruch Baum
2020-09-17 13:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-09-17 20:10 ` Boruch Baum
2020-09-18 6:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-09-18 7:49 ` martin rudalics
2020-09-29 13:05 ` Boruch Baum
2020-09-29 14:34 ` martin rudalics
2020-09-29 14:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-09-15 18:47 ` Michael Albinus
2020-09-15 19:31 ` Boruch Baum
2020-09-17 11:07 ` Michael Albinus
2020-09-17 20:03 ` Boruch Baum [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200917192925.4ponjwm7emwsoxvn@E15-2016.optimum.net \
--to=boruch_baum@gmx.com \
--cc=43412@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=michael.albinus@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).